@Advocatus Diaboli he invented the product

Or even the best OS

He sold the product

Hes successful because he got to the market first and the value is literally boosted from usage alonr

Doesn't mean he must earn money just for copyright

And not how good the OS actually is

Nothing shit about marginal utlity. You can make two goods with the same amount of work, one can take you to the moon and one can explode

But they have the same price smh

Do you know who elliot rodger is

Ffs

They wont because nobody will buy that which will kill them

@moose clinton No U No U No U No U No U No U No U No U No U No U

You don't know its quality before you buy it

Yes and my name works well with fedota spencer

@Advocatus Diaboli reviews?

You fucking mong

I will take a break from this

Its ironic so

Tripadvisor doesnt exist

Reviews won't tell me about the quality of a specific item

Trustpilot doesnt exist

Particular item I'd like to buy

@Advocatus Diaboli yes the fucking will?

Especially if the item is popular

If you want an item that will take you to the moon and you read a review that an item you want to buy explodes

You wont buy it

Otherwise why doesnt everyone make explosive rockets for commercial use

Factories with modern machinery and qualified workers still produce defective goods

Not an argument

Im talking about marginal utlity

What you said does not disqualify marginal utility

In fact an iphone is in theory just as easy to make as a lunchbox

Are their values the same?

Or a clock, for that matter

Use value

Why tf should I think about marginal utility? If there are two items, the first one is a quality product and the second one is useless, they have the same price. If you remove the second one, the price remains the same. If you remove the first one, the price remains the same.

>iphone is in theory just as easy to make as a lunchbox
No. You need more resources to make an iPhone, advanced machinery etc.

Like I said or a clock

But all the tools and material you use to make an iPhone are products of labor

It's just different amounts of labor

Not an argument