**And you understand I don't actually advocate for this but alright.**

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_cleansing

mainly in brazil and colombia

But why?

Once again, it's killing drug consumers.

Literally makes no sense.

generally the poor in colombia and brazil aren't the ones buying the drugs

"In the 1980s, 'social cleansing' groups started to be created. Their main mission was 'to make justice' by killing all non-appropriate people in social terms, like prostitutes, street-living people, transvestites, and drug addicts"

Then why did you say to put people in ghettos into rehab instead of dropping the kinetic rods when the poor don't buy drugs?

._.

I NEVER SAID THAT POOR PEOPLE DON'T BUY DRUGS

I said that the poor people in latin america weren't the primary consumers of drugs

the people HERE are the ones buying the drugs

And where does it talk about the drug cartels doing it? What you just quoted is more of a social purging group, which removes drug dealers, creators, etc.

okay I admit that I was wrong there

it's mostly paramilitaries

Yeah...

Quite obviously..

but that doesn't make it any better

Where the fuck did you pull out the idea that Drug cartels would do social purging?

I'm legit curious.

drug cartels and paramilitaries often work together

Definently not on social cleansing

The paramilitaries would fucking purge the drug cartels.

yeah low level drug dealers are often purged (which I didn't know about)

but it doesn't change the fact (to bring it back to the original argument) that mass killing of poor people is a terrible idea

Depends.

From an economic point of view...

And then we go to the moral point of view.. which is subjective as fuck..

it sets a precedent

IN

THE

NAME

OF

THE

TSAR

@Scipio the thing is that your "solution" just won't last

Yearly purging?

FINAL SOLUTION

<:GWchadMEGATHINK:366999806343774218>

everyone you miss will be very dangerous