A prost by a journalist, very relevant

even more

https://m.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/10-facts-stalins-great-purge.html

do you have any clue what a reliable source in this context mean ?

I can't post pics here

RIP

Instead of attacking my sources, prove them wrong.

Using articles for arguments is g a y

You're denying every source I give because you know them to hold truth. You attack the credibility instead of attacking the claim, because the claim is true.

Well, the first article s backed by nothing. Has literally no sources

Scipio

Lol

second one is the same

But if you don't use them, then you get stuck in a stale mate of denial so w t f do you do

What's this about

dunno

Neat

eagle do NOT mute Mr. E

As in the general that defeated hannibal or the house from rome total war one

and the third one is the same

Who is Mr e what did he do

Get out of here cuckservatives

literally no source

Nobody asked for your individualism

I can write a blog and take it as sources

mr E is honestly the best troll i've ever seen

Nobody cares about him

So stfu

Rip

thats because hes that good at being a troll smh

primary-hand or atleast second-hand sources

@Inferno Afrikanus

not articles, do you have any ?

I have provided evidence for my claims, you have not. This works in two ways.

What claims

You can attack my sources, and I can attack yours, you have made a claim, same as me, I'd expect you to back it up.

If I take a shit and put it in a bucket and call it proof that Stalin killed 9147189749871487187 billions people, would you believe me ?

because I just listed you a source

complaining about people attacking sources is big stupid tbh

I'm not complaining, I'm saying that he should provide sources aswell, seeing he has made a claim.

Or do we not back up our statements now?