fascists think that just a 'nationalist' system

would resolve the issues of **global capitalism**

I just took my aprox. 1 week absence

hence they are not left wing

am i wrong though?

And now I'm back

So

is communism achievable if not globally?

left wing is an internationalist movement, it requires a global struggle

capitalism is a global system of course the next development in economic mode of production is going to be globalized

The best ideology in theory if everything went good somehow would be pacifist anarchism

is communism achievable if it is not global?

no

that's not communism

^

it would be like saying

then advoc has just said it

capitalism is possible without it being globalized

unless the entire world is communist, communism is not achievable

mfw it took a communist to tell you communism is unachievable

...

you make it sound like a ridiculous thing but capitalism wouldn't work without it being globalized

so are you saying

capitalism is impossible

there is no 'capitalism' in one country

if you scroll up, the only parts where i've mentioned capitalism is in a theoretical society which a communist society is invaded by a capitalist one

however what you've said is communism is unachievable if it is not global

but that's not the condition communism arises

thank you for proving my point

Capitalism only works in theory

the condition communism arises is when the global socialist movement has destroyed capitalist states

and recreated the society of old

Perpetual Moral Imbalance - Today at 5:42 PM
is communism achievable if it is not global?
[CPGSA] Advocatus Diaboli - Today at 5:42 PM
no
[CPGSA] GoodVenerisLeftside - Today at 5:42 PM
that's not communism

it's akin to asking something like saying

"is it possible for labour theory of value to be valid if i create something without labour."

which i've had someone literally say to me before

it's a pointless question

because it doesn't account for why, how, or from where the communist society arises

if the entire world is not communist, is communism achievable?

your point is reductionist, you're not debating in good faith

i've yet to recieve a straight answer