There is no military to protect them

Because the generals would have too much power

Well this is where it comes into the fact that capitalists would try to destroy any 'communist society' let alone a 'socialist one;

And the military needs a leader to instruct them

Hence generals

as we currently understand, communism has no higher power to enforce communism or even defend communism

This is why marxists divide history into these periods 'primitive communims, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, and communism'

are we incorrect?

no because you don't let me finish

WHAT?

so we're not incorrect

well that's it then

nobody can defend communism in a communistic society

well you keep jumping to conclusions

and is therefore impossible

👏

before letting me explain anything

So communism has no leader and no protector

ffs

because it doesn't fucking require one

let them explain

So the ENTIRE world has to be communist

the contradictions that require a military

shut up and listen to @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼

with NO opposition

or a 'protector'

are a result of capitalism

Hi

Ok I'm done

as you've explained it, *the entire world* has to be willingly communist for communism to work

Benny leave while you can

you're not doing a very good job at explaining

communism is after a period of socialistic development where the old capitalist order is destroyed, private property is abolished, and therefore the contradictions that arise 'class-conflict' dis-appear

as we understand it, there is no military or higher power to protect communism from being changed

because it doesn't need one

alright

your assumption is that it does

let's say russia goes full blown communist

it couldn't

theoretically

but it couldn't