Fuckers tried arguing that marriage wasn't religious, at one point.

It is a historic institution between a man and a woman... at least the term is

Doesn't mean I support that

times change

people need to change with that

Sometimes,

change is bad.

And we need to know when to hold onto what we had before,

and when to let it go.

And yes,

my country has censorship.

It's also led by a Southern government, which would explain why.

Letting go of the traditional interpretation of marriage would be good

But the U.K. isn't much better than indonesia in that regard

In which regard?

Many Christians still view marriage in the traditional way

No..

Mate..

In Indonesia, by law, you have to be a Muslim to marry a Muslim.

._.

Both Islamic and Christian interpretations of marriage are outdated

In the UK,

it's free for all faiths.

:/

We do different religious marriages.

In Christian countries you have to be a Christian to marry a Christian typically. Only difference is one is enforced by society and one is enforced by law.

Heh,

and which Christian country are you refering to?

The United Kingdom?

European ones, North American ones, most of them really

If so, you have definently not spent enough time here.

Lol

Secularism has made great progress in still majority Christian nations thankfully

Eh, hopefully Secularism never works.

That is contradictory

Would rather keep the religious representation in HL.

You just criticized Indonesia for enforcing their religious views of marriage by law, which is connecting religion to the state, yet you are advocate for the same thing

You are either a secularist or you are not a secularist

You understand that the UK is a none secular nation yet allows mixed religious marriage?

You treat this as black and white.

Why do you apply a different standard to Indonesia than you do the U.K.?