The Shakers were a major problem

yes, yes they were, but the key word is were

too bad mass is so pozzed

Peter Tedeschi will win Bill Keating’s congressional seat

Good

be ready faggots

the return of the alchemist may be neigh

ina uhaul?

i lied, you guys got saved by a jewish guy in NYC

a jewish “guy”

>humanizes them
>is libertarian
reee

what are you guys talking about

what jewish guy

the bomber presumably?

the Boston Bomber?

nah, he was a filthy CHECHEN

the attempted bomber whose plan was foiled perhaps?

did someone post about it in this channel?

this is literally all I see

it looks like a bunch of posts got deleted

or some guy is in this server but has me blocked (not sure if that's possible)

oh

idk

Btw what's the official stance on the 3 questions?

I already voted

No on number 3 would change the bathroom laws back the way they were. But I’m pretty sure they won’t get it.

I voted no on 1 and 3, yes on 2

Apparently "yes" on 3 is a repeal of the law prohibiting discrimination against the transgendered -- in other words, it allows gender-segregated bathrooms.

Wait wat

I voted against that

NO TRUST WHITE SQUAW WHO TOOK OUR LAND
SHE HAS DOUBLE NATURE LIKE FACE OF COYOTE

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/10/15/warren-addresses-native-american-issue/YEUaGzsefB0gPBe2AbmSVO/story.html

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/15/politics/donald-trump-elizabeth-warren-dna-1-million/index.html

I'm more native than her

🆙 | **jackborne1893 leveled up!**

Neat

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/411521-cherokee-nation-warrens-use-of-dna-test-inappropriate-wrong

She even used an analysis conducted by _a former coworker_!

@Nuke A vote on 3* is a referendum on the standing law. “Do you approve of the law that allows men to pee-pee in the little girls room?” “Of course I do you bigot fascist, I voted yes!” “Heavens no! The law is bad for Massachusetts. I voted no.”