Message from @Ghawk

Discord ID: 426061866079617027


2018-03-21 16:45:26 UTC  

I would not lie, but it is not to say that people do lie on these polls. The people also taking these polls don't really go out of their liberal bubbles either.

2018-03-21 16:49:38 UTC  

@mojo8448 @everyone Whitepill!

2018-03-21 16:50:12 UTC  

While you were asleep Kelly (the most viable Dem candidate) lost the IL-06 Dem primary!

2018-03-21 16:50:27 UTC  

Very nice

2018-03-21 16:50:36 UTC  

Sean has won instead

2018-03-21 16:50:46 UTC  

Two White men running against each other

2018-03-21 16:51:02 UTC  

the GOP should have the advantage in this race

2018-03-21 16:54:18 UTC  

Roskam's district?

2018-03-21 16:54:39 UTC  

yes

2018-03-21 16:54:43 UTC  

the Soccer Mom district

2018-03-21 16:54:43 UTC  

yay

2018-03-21 16:54:54 UTC  

Fuck yes\

2018-03-21 16:55:09 UTC  

without a strong, yaaaaaas kween candidate,

2018-03-21 16:55:14 UTC  

Soccer Moms won't show up to vote

2018-03-21 16:56:12 UTC  

Though, the best presidential candidate in 1992 and 1996 does bring up some great points in his blog post. http://buchanan.org/blog/is-the-gop-staring-at-another-1930-128908

2018-03-21 16:56:33 UTC  

Buchanan's the best

2018-03-21 16:56:56 UTC  

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 when they called and asked me who I was voting for I told them Clinton, people lie on polls all the time

2018-03-21 16:57:09 UTC  

^

2018-03-21 16:57:15 UTC  

but why

2018-03-21 16:57:42 UTC  

Because I hate polls, they totally over sample democrats and so it gives them a moral boost and makes them complacent

2018-03-21 16:57:44 UTC  

Because if Democrats see the polls and see Clinton in the lead, they may not be inclined to come out and vote.

2018-03-21 16:57:58 UTC  

^

2018-03-21 16:58:06 UTC  

people lie in polls all the time lol

2018-03-21 16:58:58 UTC  

the could work the other way around,

2018-03-21 16:59:09 UTC  

It didn't in 2016

2018-03-21 16:59:19 UTC  

people might see their candidate slumping in the polls, and feel there's no point in trying

2018-03-21 16:59:27 UTC  

So we have one scenario that did happen, and other that's theoretical

2018-03-21 16:59:32 UTC  

obviously not in 2016

2018-03-21 16:59:35 UTC  

I'm going to go by what's empirical

2018-03-21 16:59:59 UTC  

The US definitely had a silent majority, they just don't turn up in elections all the time.

2018-03-21 17:00:23 UTC  

I don't think they'll turn out for the midterms because the GOP isn't exposing Democrats

2018-03-21 17:01:08 UTC  

They need to on Bob Menendez.

2018-03-21 17:01:42 UTC  

>mfw a Democrat that sold out to corruption is the leading candidate for DNC in NJ

2018-03-21 17:01:49 UTC  

Bob Menendez was suspected to be corrupt since 2006

2018-03-21 17:01:58 UTC  

such good principals

2018-03-21 17:02:01 UTC  

nothing has happened since them

2018-03-21 17:02:06 UTC  

Fucking niggers

2018-03-21 17:02:31 UTC  

I wish Republicans were as partisan as Democrats

2018-03-21 17:02:33 UTC  

Buchanan thought NJ would vote him out since 2006, but he said he overestimated the principles of New Jersey

2018-03-21 17:02:33 UTC  

Bob Menendez is now accused of having sex with an underaged prostitute.

2018-03-21 17:02:50 UTC  

They just vote party line and nothing else