Message from @lancerelliott {CARTHAGE}

Discord ID: 498681898789240842


2018-10-08 02:20:52 UTC  

Tumblr doesn’t have ShareBlue shills raiding it all the time

2018-10-08 02:20:57 UTC  

He literally dedicated his vote to impeach Dilma Rousseff to her military torturer as a Communist guerrilla PoW.

2018-10-08 02:21:10 UTC  

@lancerelliott {CARTHAGE} /pol/ is satire, that's a very well noted feature

2018-10-08 02:21:12 UTC  

And he wants military dictatorship and monarchy

2018-10-08 02:21:17 UTC  

I love him.

2018-10-08 02:21:31 UTC  

Also, he wants to ban contraceptives and sodomy.

2018-10-08 02:21:32 UTC  

@FLanon It provides a totally consequence-free space where anyone of any backround and ideology may espouse anything they want. This has the side effect of attracting miscreants and political outliers.

2018-10-08 02:21:44 UTC  

@FLanon doubt

2018-10-08 02:21:53 UTC  

it is

2018-10-08 02:22:00 UTC  

>falling for satire

2018-10-08 02:22:09 UTC  

@Nuke Thats a minority portion of his party.

2018-10-08 02:22:11 UTC  

I think that all the lefties on the internet need to be put in Tumblr and ResetEra and whenever those places get too big, we build another containment place

2018-10-08 02:22:21 UTC  

SCP?

2018-10-08 02:23:12 UTC  

@lancerelliott {CARTHAGE} Military dictatorship is the majority position.

2018-10-08 02:23:22 UTC  

Idiot.

2018-10-08 02:23:28 UTC  

I've read extensivley about his party and the man himself.

2018-10-08 02:23:31 UTC  

This is not true.

2018-10-08 02:23:37 UTC  

that's right

2018-10-08 02:23:40 UTC  

he is a communist

2018-10-08 02:23:46 UTC  

No more gay marriage! No more affirmative action!

2018-10-08 02:23:49 UTC  

I understand there is a smaller portion of his party that supports a monarchy, and this has resulted in him being deemed "far-right".

2018-10-08 02:23:50 UTC  

GO GO BOLSONARO!

2018-10-08 02:23:56 UTC  

@FLanon Shit tier baits bro.

2018-10-08 02:23:59 UTC  

Try harder.

2018-10-08 02:24:00 UTC  

e.e

2018-10-08 02:24:03 UTC  

Vote for the King.

2018-10-08 02:24:11 UTC  

democratically remove democracy

2018-10-08 02:24:16 UTC  

yes

2018-10-08 02:24:18 UTC  

as hitler did

2018-10-08 02:25:04 UTC  

Hitler was a centrist though.

2018-10-08 02:25:10 UTC  

he was far left

2018-10-08 02:25:20 UTC  

national SOCIALIST

2018-10-08 02:25:24 UTC  

Woke.

2018-10-08 02:27:52 UTC  

In all fairness, Hitler and Mussolini were complex in terms of economical policy. Both of them extensivley nationalized key industry and created federal work programs alongside investing in infrastructure; a key component of Kenysian economics. However, Hitler and Mussolini also privatized large portions of the economy, most notably the Autobahn. However, I remain firm in my conviction that both are left-wing due to the fact Hitler and Mussolini both established heavy government infulence and regulation over the small private sector that still existed, often resulting in mutually-benefical relationships in which the state gained taxes and political loyalty, and in return, the cooperations received monopolies.

2018-10-08 02:37:27 UTC  

The Nazi government took the stance that enterprises should be in private hands wherever possible. [41] State ownership was to be avoided unless it was absolutely necessary for rearmament or the war effort, and even in those cases “the Reich often insisted on the inclusion in the contract of an option clause according to which the private firm operating the plant was entitled to purchase it.”[42] Companies privatized by the Nazis included the four major commercial banks in Germany, which had all come under public ownership during the prior years: Commerz– und Privatbank , Deutsche Bank und Disconto-Gesellschaft , Golddiskontbank and Dresdner Bank . [43][44] Also privatized were the Deutsche Reichsbahn (German Railways), at the time the largest single public enterprise in the world, the Vereinigte Stahlwerke A.G. (United Steelworks), the second largest joint-stock company in Germany (the largest was IG Farben) and Vereinigte Oberschlesische Hüttenwerke AG , a company controlling all of the metal production in the Upper Silesian coal and steel industry. The government also sold a number of shipbuilding companies, and enhanced private utilities at the expense of municipally owned utilities companies.[45] Additionally, the Nazis privatized some public services which had been previously provided by the government, especially social and labor-related services, and these were mainly taken over by organizations affiliated with the Nazi Party that could be trusted to apply Nazi racial policies.[46]

2018-10-08 02:37:37 UTC  

One of the reasons for the Nazi privatization policy was to cement the partnership between the government and business interests.[47] Another reason was financial. As the Nazi government faced budget deficits due to its military spending, privatization was one of the methods it used to raise more funds.[48] Between the fiscal years 1934-35 and 1937-38, privatization represented 1.4 percent of the German government's revenues.[49] There was also an ideological motivation. Nazi ideology held entrepreneurship in high regard, and “private property was considered a precondition to developing the creativity of members of the German race in the best interest of the people. [50] The Nazi leadership believed that “private property itself provided important incentives to achieve greater cost consciousness, efficiency gains, and technical progress.” [51] Adolf Hitler used Social Darwinist arguments to support this stance, cautioning against “bureaucratic managing of the economy” that would preserve the weak and “represent a burden to the higher ability, industry and value.” [52]

2018-10-08 02:45:19 UTC  

@lancerelliott {CARTHAGE} Also the guy in charge of the Economic policy of Nazi Germany was never a member of the NSDAP and was a member of the German Democratic Party a Classical Liberal party

2018-10-08 02:46:07 UTC  

ie he was more or less a Libertarian