Message from @Red Storm (in NYC)

Discord ID: 404691337946988545


2018-01-21 17:23:10 UTC  

around 53% of the house's seat makeup

2018-01-21 17:23:50 UTC  

we can still get a ton of things done with that composition

2018-01-21 17:25:12 UTC  

Is the average House Republican more or less cucked than the average Senate Republican? It may be that Senate Republicans are more prominent and that's why we judge them so much, but I feel that House Republicans are okay for the most part.

2018-01-21 17:25:59 UTC  

If we can keep the wind to our backs, we could make that margin better

2018-01-21 17:26:49 UTC  

The House is far less cucked, they've passed some good immigration bills but the Senate hasn't taken them up yet

2018-01-21 17:27:06 UTC  

Yeah, the house itself is less cucked

2018-01-21 17:28:16 UTC  

but 55% of the representatives are republicans, which is a far cry from the Senate which has 51 and used to have 52 Republican senators

2018-01-21 17:28:45 UTC  

I'm asking per capita, is the average house republican better than the average republican senator

2018-01-21 17:29:29 UTC  

there's a possibility that the larger number overshadows the cucks in the house

2018-01-21 17:29:38 UTC  

I'm going to research this, brb

2018-01-21 17:33:06 UTC  

I was going to use conservativereview but looks like the scorecard section of the site is down

2018-01-21 17:35:40 UTC  

these are all the House Reps that are better or as good as the best Republican Senator

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399676530394923010/404690527322112000/senate_vs_house.png

2018-01-21 17:36:38 UTC  

2% of peer group vs 8 % of peer group

2018-01-21 17:37:01 UTC  

well, looks like the hypothesis is right, senators are more cucked per capita than representatives

2018-01-21 17:37:15 UTC  

I'd like a source for that btw so I can get into the details

2018-01-21 17:38:04 UTC  

the House of Representatives has always been more partisan (which means it tends to be less 'cucked') than the Senate

2018-01-21 17:38:10 UTC  

it makes sense

2018-01-21 17:38:44 UTC  

the House consists of specific districts whereas the Senate consists of the entire state, which means that Senators have to appeal to a wider array of people, which means they can't be as partisan

2018-01-21 17:38:49 UTC  

unless it's a state like Wyoming

2018-01-21 17:38:53 UTC  

or Massachusetts

2018-01-21 17:38:55 UTC  

whoa it's actually a lot more than 8%

2018-01-21 17:39:12 UTC  

whereas a state like Florida is going to have senators that have to appeal to both the left and the right

2018-01-21 17:39:21 UTC  

hence moderate Dems like Bill Nelson

2018-01-21 17:39:26 UTC  

15% w/ an A+

2018-01-21 17:40:24 UTC  

oh right

2018-01-21 17:40:31 UTC  

2% of the senate republicans w/ an A

2018-01-21 17:41:16 UTC  

So, if the margins in the house get close, you shouldn't have to worry about it stalling as much as in the senate

2018-01-21 17:41:25 UTC  

we simply need a majority

2018-01-21 17:41:45 UTC  

/ourguy/ Pete Sessions could be in jeopardy in Texas-32

2018-01-21 17:41:46 UTC  

I'd say at least 53% would be good for whatever bill we need

2018-01-21 17:42:01 UTC  

there are a number of Reps we can afford to lose, but Sessions isn't one of them

2018-01-21 17:42:24 UTC  

give me an analysis

2018-01-21 17:44:31 UTC  

He's an immigration hardliner but his Congressional District went for Hilllary Clinton in 2016 so it makes him vulnerable,
makes sense since it's a suburban district,
fortunately, he's the only non-cucked Rep that is at risk this election season

2018-01-21 17:44:56 UTC  

Looks like he has a good electoral record

2018-01-21 17:45:15 UTC  

he kept strong during the 2006 situation

2018-01-21 17:45:37 UTC  

in 2016 they only ran 3rd parties against him

2018-01-21 17:46:05 UTC  

hmm

2018-01-21 17:46:12 UTC  

definitely should keep him safe, make sure to add these points into the /rsg/ threads

2018-01-21 17:46:15 UTC  

yeah, he's going to need a shitton of money and ground game