Message from @🎃Boo-ton🎃
Discord ID: 407213379069935646
the number of variables we have is astounding, really
if X person retires, if Y event happens
it all seems out of our grasp
we should contribute, that's important, but I can't help thinking this is all in the hands of the elite or some other higher power
the party in power has won 0% of the districts that were carried by the opposite party in the previous presidential election and which the incumbent have retired from
meaning there is a 100% the GOP will lose at least 4 seats, regardless of net change
why at least 4
I'm guessing you have specific ones in mind (in CA, probably)
there are 4 Republican districts that Clinton won in 2016 and where the incumbent is retiring
Hey
hey guys
do me a favor...save this to your computer, and every once in a while, copy and paste any state info you feel like to /ptg/
done and done
I'm working on expanding it to include all 50 states
also, save these images
and include the image for each state with each copypasta
for example ^
how can someone like schumer be so popular anywhere
@🎃Boo-ton🎃 you never know
you can tell he's a crook by looking at him
you really never know
like LBJ
Gillibrand can lose, like anyone can lose
It would took a scandal
@FLanon here's what's funnny....in 2016, 1,000,000 more voters voted for Schumer in comparison to Hillary
I wonder if there were any who voted for Trump, but also voted for Schumer
my God
pretty much any deep red and blue state will require a scandal to flip
Hillary got around 4 million
Schumer got around 5 million
Trump got 2.8 million
the GOP senate candidate Wendy Long (never even heard of her) ....got 2 million
I think the only ones in that situation would be Israel hardliners or something
people turnout more when the stakes are higher
people don't turn out for Senate races like they would Presidential races
the higher the office, the higher the turnout