more than good enough

We don't even need much more than 60

Hell, high 50s would be decent

I think 55 at least will get whatever agenda Trump wants passed done.

Assuming we don't win all the former blue rust belt states, and both West Virginia and Virginia... That still places us at 57

did you take Nevada out of the equation

no, that's assuming we win Nevada

http://www.270towin.com/2018-senate-election/2A4Dma

if we don't win in Nevada, it's 56

http://www.270towin.com/2018-senate-election/2do7ra

this is the scenario if we add the rust belt states, West Virginia, and Virginia on top of that

I think we can reach 300 posts if we keep the discussion going at this rate

Hypothetically...what do you guys think the 2020 Presidential results would be if John Kerry was the Democratic nominee?

I honestly think Trump has a good chance of winning all 50 states in that scenario

no one can win all 50 states no matter what

states are too partisan

Reagan almost won all of them in 1984

since 1992, states have been becoming less and less comptetive

yeah, but no state is truly 100% solid

it would be take disastrous scandals to flip MA and VT

lol those are the 2 states that would have still gone blue if only white males voted in 2016

part of that is because they're very white states

white male vote

welcome

we haven't had a new member since a couple weeks ago, I think

correct me if I'm wrong

what state are you from @birdman

I move around a lot, i'm in WA rn

Are you still going to be in Washington come November

WA-8?

Seattle rn, and no

dang, strong Dem state and even stronger Dem district

in that case, focus more on spreading the word online and psy-ops

Will do

@birdman

save these

feel free to make the general in your own time, if there isn't one at the moment

by the way, anyone here should feel free to make the general if there isn't one