Regardless we should shove this election in the shills' and blue wavers faces if this plays out like @🎃Boo-ton🎃 is hoping

For God's sakes, these elections are so damned small you can have a single person put posters up all over the district and they'd win from recognizability alone

Look at the count, like a thousand people vote

@FLanon yeah, Gillespie, Moore, and a lot of state legislature republican candidates would have won if they just put more effort into campaigning instead of sitting on their asses

We should be raking these in

If there's one thing I'm learning, in electoral politics, there's no such thing as "high and dry"

It's always a battle you have to fight tooth and nail

@FLanon I think local elections have far more to do with the recognizability and work the candidate puts in, than their political party and stances on the issues

I hope Trump is realizing this after VA and AL, we need to have him make appearances everywhere.

I know, these offices are so obscure

who the hell even keeps track of how their state representative / state senator / city councilman votes

"House District-23B"

@FLanon 59%

Only the most hardcore of democracy believers would actually go through the trouble

*cough* boomers

Only the most hardcore political people keep track of state legislatures

that and autists like us

Yeah

Exactly

Lmao

Just put up fucking signs holy shit

Anyways, since Trump won this place with 59% and this guy (with the most recent info we have) has 68%

59-41 vs 68-30

@FLanon to clarify though I don't even think it's boomers in general who would go through the trouble

probably old people who are retired, some of which are boomers

That would be something like a 20 point R swing, right?

some of which are silent generation, some of which are greatest generation

If I have my info right

I get it, but boomer's a bit of a catch-all term if you get my drift

I don't know anyone in real life who cares about local elections, maybe aside from the NYC mayoral election

That's why like 1000 people per district which probably has like something to the effect of 10000 people at the very least vote

I can't imagine it being any more than 5% of the population

@🎃Boo-ton🎃 where are you getting the results from btw

if there were only 1000 people at a 5% rate, it would be 50 people

what do you exactly mean

WE DID IT

I mean that the 1000 people are the voters

WE REVERSED THE TREND

REPUBLICANS HAVE THE MOMENTUM

in a 10000 or 20000 scenario

Well, there you go!