Message from @Soldz (CF)
Discord ID: 489333442266267649
you did pretty good
if youre searching for the truth, keep asking those hard questions
someone will have an answer for you
if you want to use some coral growths in the red sea as your only backing verus modern archeology, go for it
you asked for other proff outside the bible, and i dont usually argue from outside the bible
so youre making a strawman
<:oof:485078292723138572>
He asked if you can prove it without the Bible, all you had to do was say no
i told him about chariots at the bottom of the red sea
he chose to dismiss that which is okay
I thought this was a one on one debate Fluff
*because it has been disproven as simple coral growths*
I'm just saying this wasn't a strawman
@Soldz (CF) nah
No double teaming
No debate is one on one in any debate channels
the strawman was asking for proof outside the bible then trying to destroy the proof given
anything not found in the bible is open to corruption
i dont like leaving the safety of the bible
Damn the bias
When you put it that way it sounds pretty bad
yeah, cause the bible has never been interpreted differently by anyone
or translated differntly
the bible is the same message
gods word is alive and active bro
the words can have different meaning
Actually brother of the church I disagree
if i can change the meaning of a word, that is corruption of it
If everyone sees the message different then there is no right or wrong
the holy spirit is able to teach different things from the same scripture
lol wat
Then whats the point
Bible can't be corrupted but everything else outside of it can
Gotcha
like, i can use the bible to support slavery, but i can also use it to condone slavery
The holy spirit is running everyone up the wall then
the bible doesnt condone slavery
Yikes
i didnt say it did
i said you can use it to condone slavery