Message from @Christmas EveryDay
Discord ID: 489331675709308929
i know what the bible says, i am saying it makes no sense
so the wandered around in the desert
and there is no backing for it
i really dont understand what info ur asking for
do you have any evidence, besides the bible. that the exodus actually happened
theres chariot pieces at the bottom of the red sea
u can find all this information with a google search
nice article
u found that fast
scroll all the way down and read whats at the bottom of the screen
in the comments?
no
Ooooof
"World News Daily Report assumes all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any person, living, dead or undead, is purely a miracle."
it was a hoax
thats nice, that doesnt mean every site talking about it is fake
is that called cherrypicking your data?
you did pretty good
if youre searching for the truth, keep asking those hard questions
if you want to use some coral growths in the red sea as your only backing verus modern archeology, go for it
you asked for other proff outside the bible, and i dont usually argue from outside the bible
so youre making a strawman
<:oof:485078292723138572>
He asked if you can prove it without the Bible, all you had to do was say no
i told him about chariots at the bottom of the red sea
he chose to dismiss that which is okay
I thought this was a one on one debate Fluff
*because it has been disproven as simple coral growths*
I'm just saying this wasn't a strawman
@Soldz (CF) nah
No double teaming
No debate is one on one in any debate channels
the strawman was asking for proof outside the bible then trying to destroy the proof given
anything not found in the bible is open to corruption
i dont like leaving the safety of the bible
Damn the bias
<:ohheck:485078351162376202>
When you put it that way it sounds pretty bad
yeah, cause the bible has never been interpreted differently by anyone