Trust me, you don't want to inject a dog with a rabies vaccine and just hope he's one of the 80% that is 100% effective with that dose, and booster timeline for example.

It's an estimate not exact

to give you the analogy

I was in the medical field

Titer testing is necessary for proving if the vaccine is effective.

they have been proven to be effective

Rodney, you are missing the principle.

I'm not arguing if they are they are ineffective or not.

i'm arguing the point of titer testing and making sure everyone is correctly immunized.

they are

Is that all you want to argue? Cause I agree with you....

so move on if you have no idea what you're talking about.

then if you agree with me

Refer to titer testing

why are we debating7

lul

Because you can't comprehend the sentences you are reading.

You are debating

You are selectively reading.

No one else is debating

what i was saying was

Rodney, refer to titer testing before you talk about effectiveness.

If you have no measure of true effectiveness within the INDIVIDUAL

Im just waiting for your proof that vaccines are healthy

Then you aren't truly measuring effectiveness

When you get that proof. Let me know

Using statistics of the fact the disease is not around anymore does not prove that the vaccine is effective within an individual, hence why diseases still run rampant after vaccination.

Titer testing measures the antibodies within each individual

that is the only way to test if -any- vaccine was effective in the individual.

Someone can be vaccinated and still get the disease.

Thus.

It isn't 100% effective.

But, you can titer test and prove if it is 100% effective, or if someone needs a booster.

it is the majority of the time

Rodney, bye.

?

assumptions get you no where.

I am telling you how to measure the effectiveness.

And you don't care.

You still cling to your bias

Alright, @daniel 225 has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.