Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 498956633917882384
your missing the point
Mind not insulting Kevin
which is what I was getting to
See this is why people shouldn't interrupt other people
660 years is not account for all the death, and all the extraneous stuff like war disease and murder that hinders people thriving
So what you have, at best, is a proof of concept.
so a little less than 10 times that amount to compensate for all the death, murder, disease, plagues, and weather like lightning and heart attacks
cancer
in 6 K years its possible, I would say probable, that people could go from 2 people to 7 billion, not even 8 billion people on this flat earth
That’s a mighty big assumption to be making, that a factor of ten accounts for all of that.
I rest my case unless I hear objections
i dont think anyone argues that there could be 8 billion people in 6000 years
its also not 8.5 billion, its 7.5 billion people on the planet, so its more than 10 X in compensation
You have been this whole time you just don't listen
Objection: According to my calculations, only two children from each family would survive to have children when accounting for death and disease, so the population should stay the same.
And it would take an extremely long amount of time to grow to 7.5 billion.
population has been growing and continues to grow
china did some radical laws to try to mitigate growth because they saw in the long run they were going to have mass starvation
kevin, this is a useless point, no one argues we can have a population of 8 billion people
Records, actual historical evidence, shows that until a couple hundred years ago, the increase in population was very, very slow.
people were argueing with me until my awesome debating skills proved them without a doubt that I was right
that is how you win a debate people
no one wants to argue with the professor
I’ve presented two objections that you have ignored.
I didn't ignore your objection, I just finished saying population is growing
its not staying the same, your objection that its not growing and staying the same is in error
Thanks to modern medicine. Whereupon we come to my second objection.
you didn't even make your 2nd objection yet
lets not put the horse before the cart
and sanatation
so you admit your first objection was a red herring to led credence to this next bogus objection
are you going to come up with any valid objections
Records, actual historical evidence, shows that until a couple hundred years ago, the increase in population was very, very slow.
sanatation was a huge improvement
my 10 X time factor takes that into account
sanitation was severely lacking but is much better
at least in some places, in india you still have 1 billion people shitting in the street
severely lacking? you mean none exsistance
in the past
people knew about bathing, just didn't do it as much in the past as they do now
You ignore counter points and ramble that's why no one l Iikes debating you