Message from @Eloha
Discord ID: 501088490507993118
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Trenches were incredibly common through out European military history. The earliest example I can recall them being used as battle tactic is in the Hundred Years' War where English forces routinely dug pits footholes & trenches in efforts to stop French cavalry charges. Aside from this, it was routine for siege warfare in which one side would carve trenches up to the forifications of a castle and then mine tunnels underneath of the walls to collapse them.
Since every knight was expected to understand siege warfare, it's reasonable to extrapolate that almost said knights knew what a trench was and how it could be used in battle. An example of "trench warfare" in European history would be the Siege of Vienna ca. 1529; in which Austrian Habsburg infantry would sally out in suicide attempts to prevent Turkish engineers from detonating charges beneath city walls.
Then we have nothing
Also, Japanese forces in the Senogku Jidai would commonly erect bamboo fences and dig pits with which to shield musketmen. Innovations in gunpowder & pike style warfare were pretty much what enables Oda Nobunaga to perform as well he did—this took place at the exact same time as the Habsburg-Ottoman Wars. Really, it's fair to say that since we have examples of European Middle Eastern Asian & Aborignees using trenches it's fair to conclude everyone did in fact comprehend digging holes.
Thanks for the history lesson with the massive bulidup to making me feel like an idiot
👌
pepe's puns are the best thing ive read all day
Although to be fair
Peeper needs to respecc native peoples history more
@TheRockisCookin You meant to say 18th Century Warfare. Besides, it was early as the times of Khan Uriyangqadai that the Dai Viet would utilize stealth-tactics to defeat a much larger foe. Though they didn't always maintain independence, their fighting spirit continued on in spite of repeated invasion at the hands of the Chinese Empire in many of its' successive nominally dynastic forms. C'mon mate, you're an American, you should respect people who bled to death in the jungles of Vietnam. For shame.
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS he was probably joking nat
like pretending to be one of those stuck-up, america-saves-the-world white nutcases
America saves the world unless that world lay upon the continent named South America.
Throw in the towel globies
Hot off the press
Amazing stuff
I think it was five minutes into my last Flat Earth video where the premise that the world governments were by force suppressing the truth was introduced.
The bloody Neo-Globers are engaging in mass politics black bloc tactics—and we can't even have a conversation about it!
@^Kevin^ Oh of course it doesn't agree with you so it's automatically denied as fake.
the person who posted the pic said it was fake
why has he got the professor role tho
I'm not a troll
I believe in flat earth
I compared the two models and flat earth is more accurate
there is too many proofs for flat earth that are valid
And far too many for globe.
unlike the few proofs for globe earth that are invalid
ship going over horizon, does NOT happen
Give me your best FE proof, and I'll debunk it, right here, right now.
can pull ship back into view with zooming
mechacical gyroscopes is one of the best proofs we live on a flat Earth
Give one video of this, where the ship is verifiably "sunk", and not just too small to see.
can see too far with no curve is another one
@Citizen Z The person who took that image talked about how they had to wait for the refractive conditions to be just right. Also, you do not see down to the bases, a lot is still missing. And, it is a well-known fact that you can only see the mountains from that vantage point on a few days of the year.
Mechanical gyroscopes in what experiment?
@The18thDoctor they are following the suggested globe model.