<:why:492975944445853696>

If you lived on a ball three feet in diameter, yes. But as you can see on that basketball, the closer you are to a ball, the closer to “eye level” the horizon is. And the claim that it “always rises to eye level” is a lie: If you go in an airplane with a theodolite, you can see that the horizon dips about three degrees.

Stop strawmanning a model you don’t understand.

@^Kevin^ you live on a ball, whether you want it to be true or not, it's reality.

As you see this is a null and void argument

Don't use that argument as it assumes the conclusion

Quite literally states the conclusion

simply stating your belief is not an argument for your belief

Today I was at the UN meeting

they talked about agenda 30

Wasn't anything scary at all, conspiracies are more than unfounded

I mean otherwise they wouldn't be conspiracies

😱

@Lemonier

what flaws does the ge model have?

No measurable curvature

Sun same size as moon

Blocked

Sun moves

Not us

Couldnt flat earth also move

depending on how you see it in space or lack thereof

We just cant experience it move or test it as moving

So why assume it is

ok well for one why do scientists say the moon's magnetic field used to be much much greater than earth's?

brb for a bit

lolk

So flat earth is that the sun and stars move

not us

Yes

that makes sense

its quite a leap to assume that everything else moves and so would the earth

makes more sense that the earth doesnt move but everything else does

Few things

how else would eclipses be so consistent

oh ya how do eclipses work? im still confused about that

North star Polaris never has moved. Thousands of years ppl use it

depends on if you are dome or no dome

actually it has moved a couple millionths of degrees over the last couple thousands of years but i get the point

Constellations do not change over time

@Lemonier we cant prove that