Okay sure, but I still hold that reversing a fisheye lens effect with photo editors is not good evidence.

Its better than claiming the fish eye lens was the curve

Its still not good evidence. Of course dumb round earthers are going to point to a lens distortion as proof.

@Citizen Z how does gravity function with regards to the most commonly accepted flat Earth model

Things fall down

Lol

Density

We dont know the exact cause

Neither do you

You claim a religious belief

<@221423521824374785> density and bouyancy

Not sure of exact cause and im not going to pretend to know

<@221423521824374785> - no its not, ..not with taht helium in it

that*

helium is less dense than air isnt it

<@172482928457023488> thats a measurement

Not a cause

<@172482928457023488> Not necessarily, some materials are incompressible.

core - they say <:lul:484994724118134784> ...

<@221423521824374785> why does the ground become less dense and have more water the deeper they drilled?

<@172482928457023488> that's an equation. Not a cause.

why does the ground become less dense and have more water the deeper they drilled?

It did

<@172482928457023488> Yea, some substances are generally incompressible (except within a small margin). Which is why they have known density values

So you are going to blatantly lie to me?

<@172482928457023488> - you're = you are

<@221423521824374785> now i can't trust anything you say

Liar.

<@172482928457023488> they're = they are
<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>

k

got an interesting topic regarding science in general

i love fish-sticks <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>

<@172482928457023488> You can, for gasses, which are compressible.

<@172482928457023488> fallacy

anyone knows about the replication crisis?

https://www.corbettreport.com/the-crisis-of-science/

physics class... doesn't that make an appeal to authority?

i love fish-sticks

<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>

@Lancelot It seems like its simply a methodological issue with soft sciences, which is not much of a surprise.