um...

comeon man

It's a valid question

you can talk im in the VC

that "shot " you're talking about, ..is the "round" boosters.thrusters part, or whatever you wanna call it/them

k

they're already round/ed

They'd be seen as a different shape though

when you take a photo of something thats already rounded it becomes somewhat distorted

the fisheye lens aint gonna curve them much, -- bcoz they're alreayd curved/rounded

etc

That's not how it works

and we can see straight objects

^

we need to evaluated more of the Footage, ..tis 50+ minutes long

the atmospheric stabiliseres for one

i picked that part out in 5 >SECONDS lol

mkay

how come the atmospheric stabilisers arent distoprted

And how is this fisheye lens only there in some shots but when the earth looks flat suddenly there's no fisheye

awnser that

If the camera's flawed so is your evidence

http://prntscr.com/nc2hpv 👈 😆 lmao! Look ath this EXTREMELY >> Exagerated "curvature"

bahaha

smh!! x D 🤣

That looks like CG tbh

Lmao called it

aight lol nvm that one then

i'll find another/more..

im just doing it fast..

within only seconds

Take your time, don't grasp at straws

There's no worth in arguing with someone who's trying too hard
Also i'd like my question about the fisheye lens answered if you know so much

http://prntscr.com/nc2j97

how can you look at that and DENY its Flat???

😆 ☝

*because physics*

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ how is this fisheye lens only there in some shots but when the earth looks flat suddenly there's no fisheye?

and if they are using fisheye how come it isnt rounded as you say

No it isn't

@Siriusly - thats how FISHEYE wide-angle lens workk duh