Man, you're making a whole lot of assumptions.

Who said they struck?

The very people **in control**.

Again.

The Christians who were...

***IN CONTROL***

No.

That I won't answer.

Wise

Again, will not answer.

Up to you.

I'm not dodging the question.

I'm answering it.

No

No, it's because I don't want to.

I simply do not want to answer.

Any problem?

Nice talking to you.

The internet will always take you not wanting to answer something as you can't.
Which is the most asinine, presumptuous shit, ever.

Fact and opinion is subjective.

<@522445440936050699> Fair point. Everyone these days do, anywhere.

<@522445440936050699> Why did you presume he is blind to physical objects?

do any of you believe that australia doesnt exist

<@522445440936050699> Not like that

I understood the metaphor

But why?

He doesn't want to answer. That doesn't mean he can't.

That's not avoiding.

He simply wouldn't even type words if he was avoiding it.

He has an opinion of the world. He doesn't need facts for an opinion. Do you think Hindus or Buddhists need facts for their beliefs of the earth being flat? <@522445440936050699>

Do they?

The answer is no. They do not.

Short answer, no.

Because I dislike what people have grossly misunderstood about their own religions.

Well, the Christians think Jesus was a physical son if God who died and came back to life.
"The Christ" is a state of being, not a person. The resurrection story is about personal enlightenment.
Many other examples.

Because these are misconceptions about what the bible says

There is evidence to what I ***do*** believe.

Prove evidence?

A person could have existed

That doesn't mean he was the son of God.