https://newspunch.com/unveiled-nasas-mars-curiosity-actually-filmed-in-greenland/

i mean i dont care at all and it just is round . period

I feel like no one here is reliable in the sense that they studied the earth and science and all that jazz

like they would know bc they went to college for it

periodt

"newspunch: where the mainstream fear to tread"

Bias

Can I get an unbiased source ?

facts

probably not

Here's another example

Photos of the moon supposed to be taken miles apart with identical back ground

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IRT61vzDauI/hqdefault.jpg

Proves that it's faked with reused backdrop

Hey

hey

hi

lmao

once again I would hope so

I have a cool video from my school of students sending a camera to space

If you superimpose the images the background features are identical

You can see curvature

Obviously it's impossible for two different locations to have the same back ground

Yes they are

It's been proven

They're not perfectly identical

Unfortunately I cannot post

Taken in the same geographical area moving towards the mountains

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/769062/Moon-landings-hoax-Apollo-15-pictures-SAME-background

Miles away

From each other according to nasa

from the article

"In terms of these pictures, it says because the Moon is smaller than Earth, horizons appear closer to the human eye than they really are, and may therefore look the same from different viewpoints."

back ground

I don’t see why this is deep

it's a clearly different image taken in the same general location, in the backdrop of those mountains

Also, express isn't exactly the best site for journalism of any kind.

They specialize in gossip.

Not scientific study.

facts

I agree, Dailymail isn’t a good source for information