Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 570637748856160265
Idk, link?
I've heard about the concept from people like David Icke
@Pinnaplia No
Not anymore
Ah ok
Because I didn't wanna have to repost the paragraph I flung at Mike earlier
i couldnt find the whole thing thats part one
its mad long
My point was that "disproving flat earth" is not really meaningful since it isn't fully defined and quantified for predictive power @Pinnaplia
Not falsifiable since it isn't set up
@jeremy Not too long, and hour and a half is usually fine for me if it is interesting
Very interesting, I'll check it out
thats part one lol
i cant remember its been a long time i think the whole things 5 hours maybe more idk
joe rogan graham hancock michael shermer debate was good
kent hovind evolution debates are good
carl munk the code was good
how do u feel on evolution
not micro evolution the rest of the evolutions
thats how they get u they bunch allt he evolution up with micro evolution
I think evolution is testable and repeatable. As far as the claims on universal common ancestry and evolutionary pathways, a lot of that is merely speculative and depends on assumptions that can't really be justified.
So I am not a fan. I'm content with not knowing the answers.
ur saying micro evolution is real
yes i agree
macro evolution im not so sure
Yes, evolution as in change in allele frequencies is testable and repeatable
Micro and macro evolution are merely constructs btw,
i think its a whole different thing
a moth changes colors to adapt to the environment better and a moth turning into something other than a moth is not even close
or a rabbit changing its fur color over time to adapt in a snow covered area or wooded area its always gonna be a rabbit i think
u think someday the rabbit will evolve to make cellphones and helicopters
u should watch a kent hovind debate
it was interesting debate on evolution
he does a ton of them he debated michael shermer
u ever see graham hancok and randall carlson debate michael shermer on joe rogan
that was good those guys have a solid theory
I have before, but I am not really interested.
oh what else besides project bluebeam u into
I like movies and encoded messages in them, I find some of the illuminati, occult, Vatican symbolism interesting.
Some philosophical topics. I used to be all into the flat earth stuff.
Apollo and 9/11 conspiracies, most rational to me out of the fringe content.
u should watch secrets in plain sight that had the vatican in it i believe
I focused a lot on science topics and then conspiracy