Message from @YahYett

Discord ID: 570759797889171497


2019-04-24 23:51:58 UTC  

Simple as that

2019-04-24 23:52:04 UTC  

Why? Because it's utterly wrong.

2019-04-24 23:52:08 UTC  

They are working, research the GR experiments and Newtonian gravitation predictions

2019-04-24 23:52:09 UTC  

...and you have studied quantum mechanics from where?

2019-04-24 23:53:22 UTC  

Even though I have formally studied QM I feel no reason to tell you where

2019-04-24 23:53:31 UTC  

Doesn't change the fact that my claims are correct

2019-04-24 23:53:34 UTC  

Right

2019-04-24 23:53:57 UTC  

Why would you study qm as a fe?

2019-04-24 23:54:02 UTC  

If you attempt to apply perturbation theory to gravity you can't renormalize it afterwards.

2019-04-24 23:54:03 UTC  

If you dont even believe in science

2019-04-24 23:54:16 UTC  

not all science is wrong

2019-04-24 23:54:28 UTC  

Plus by trying to quantise the einstein-hilbert field equations we're only able to quantise the stress-energy-momentum tensor, not the metric tensor.

2019-04-24 23:54:28 UTC  

Says what fe

2019-04-24 23:54:30 UTC  

some science is more faith based

2019-04-24 23:54:53 UTC  

like gravity

2019-04-24 23:54:55 UTC  

evolution

2019-04-24 23:54:58 UTC  

I mean, you can assert your own flawed preconceptions of a flat earther but they don't apply to all

2019-04-24 23:54:59 UTC  

macro evolution

2019-04-24 23:55:14 UTC  

In fact, learning more advanced physics helped me realize how wrong gravity is.

2019-04-24 23:55:24 UTC  

yeah i dont like how flat earthers get straw manned all the time

2019-04-24 23:55:40 UTC  

So by learning about it you find it is 100% wrong huh

2019-04-24 23:55:41 UTC  

Quantim physics is the reason you're able to use whatever device you're own right now.

2019-04-24 23:55:55 UTC  

You think gravity=QM?

2019-04-24 23:55:57 UTC  

🤔

2019-04-24 23:56:04 UTC  

But we arent using qm when figuring acceleration due to gravity for eartch

2019-04-24 23:56:10 UTC  

It is a complete non-sequitir on your part, you ignore all the other experimentation to make a generalization off of something we don't have a complete understanding of

2019-04-24 23:56:28 UTC  

Oh here comes the ignorance

2019-04-24 23:56:35 UTC  

Is your argument that we dont understand QFT

2019-04-24 23:56:46 UTC  

The arguably most successful theory in physics?

2019-04-24 23:56:49 UTC  

Who you adressing? Me?

2019-04-24 23:56:54 UTC  

Both

2019-04-24 23:57:00 UTC  

The first sentence was to both of you

2019-04-24 23:57:12 UTC  

No but most fe dont know basic fundamental sciences

2019-04-24 23:57:17 UTC  

No, that is not my argument

2019-04-24 23:57:28 UTC  

I'm not "most fe"

2019-04-24 23:57:41 UTC  

I never counted you as one

2019-04-24 23:57:45 UTC  

Which clearly tou are not

2019-04-24 23:57:52 UTC  

And i actually do respect that

2019-04-24 23:58:33 UTC  

My claim is that your premises are correct but wrongly applied because you choose to ignore a wealth of other support in light of something needing further advancement

2019-04-24 23:58:43 UTC  

97 eleven let me ask u think

2019-04-24 23:58:49 UTC  

let me ask u th is please