tell 97 how we are better at human space travel now than we were in 1969

Well, you are right about that, they haven't "proven" them but they worked well enough for them to use as theories

"Proven" is the wrong word I'd say

@97 Eleven because to use the pendulum to calculate it you would need an isolated gravitationally neutral zone

Except they don't

their is no evidence of 2 objects of mass being drawn toward each other becuase of their mass alone

Neither work as theories

@jeremy did you not watch the videos i sent you... Three of them

link me the video right in here of the experiment please

Gravity and furthermore general relativity cannot be reconciled with one of the most successfully theories in physics.

wait u jsut told me their was no experiment

u said it wasnt possible on earth

They do. That is how they predicted Neptune, orbits, and a host of other phenomena in a fair margin of accuracy

@jeremy matter, the energy is what theoretically is to be expected the driving force behind the rapid expansionof the. Cosmic horizon

They're not working theories

@jeremy it is lmfao they are proving it by using a pendulum

A complete theory of gravity would be quantum gravity

Do you want me to prove it to you??

And there's a reason that doesn't exist

Hecc sake

And in the quantum world gravity is a whole different thing....

No it isn't

It doesn't exist in the quantum world

Simple as that

Why? Because it's utterly wrong.

They are working, research the GR experiments and Newtonian gravitation predictions

...and you have studied quantum mechanics from where?

Even though I have formally studied QM I feel no reason to tell you where

Doesn't change the fact that my claims are correct

Right

Why would you study qm as a fe?

If you attempt to apply perturbation theory to gravity you can't renormalize it afterwards.

If you dont even believe in science

not all science is wrong

Plus by trying to quantise the einstein-hilbert field equations we're only able to quantise the stress-energy-momentum tensor, not the metric tensor.

Says what fe

some science is more faith based

like gravity

evolution

I mean, you can assert your own flawed preconceptions of a flat earther but they don't apply to all

macro evolution