Lmao

So you have no clue what you are talking about

Tell me this

Why did we first determine the equivalence principle

Not word for word

What mathematical relation led to it

You tell me

🤔

I asked the question

He will google it

I'll wait

Nothing wrong with that, but I won't.
You tell me, I admit I don't know the answer to that

Since I assume you are making a point

Then dont get into an argument you cant win

It arises due to the fact that gravational mass is exactly equal to inertial mads

Mass*

Which is why i decided not to continue

97 why dont u explain something simple to them like boats going over the curve

I don't care about winning arguments

I'm just demonstrating your ignorance

If 97 eleven has formally studied then i back off

You don't know what you're citing

97 tell them about boats over the curve when going out to sea please

UA falls apart quite easily from numerous points of views

You asked about a mathematical relationship as if it is historical context

Oh ffs

You would need math to back up your argument

In most cases to deal with physics

@AstralSentient so tell me, what's providing the infinite source of energy that allows UA

I'm rather curious

97 its clear he knows nothing about what he is talking about lol

I am simply stating it follows from the equivalence principle as a valid model of local gravity. I originally brought it up because you mentioned GR's predictions in terms flat vs globe earth

You didnt even know what the principle was how can you even bring that up

Then are you asserting that UA is right or wrong?

I don't think the earth is a flat disc accelerating up, so no

In your context

so we all agree gravity is untestable and it doesnt really exist in the way they say it does

Goes back to this btw;
*As a mathematical model it can predict things that align with the globe model
But when it comes to FE it doesn't*

i would love to hear what 97 has to say about bots going over the curve and the palces we can see too far for globe math like chicago from michigan

boats

Perspective for the former and rayleigh scattering plus atmospheric extinction for the latter