Optics

Angular size and resolution are important

Indio made a good vid about it

Ah yes, I recall

so their is other possibilities than the boat is going over a curve ok

Do you think we could get a nice predictable relationship with how ships are obscured by optics vs the globe model to compare to real life observation?

well first of all the water rises up to ur eyesight thats not really happenning

the water is under ur feet

not over ur neck

Maybe

We could test both in principle

Steve Torrence had some models on it

im glad 97 showed up it was a nice change of pace

Hopefully they stick around

Found it;
https://youtu.be/nK-WJwVGh8k

It also can explain in quantified terms why the horizon rises to eye level on a flat plane.

Reduced to these simple relations;
o= d (tan [theta])
d= o / (tan [theta])
d is distance, o is observer height
Top is obstruction bottom is horizon distance

We got something to work from at least

Oh, and theta for angular resolution

Earth is flat lol

no its a gloooobe

(I'm secretly smarter than they think)

the lunar eclips is the same as the solar eclips

I guess so lol

Good morning everyone

I think Earth is flat, because God wanted to see everyone from above

lunar and solar eclipses aren't the same thing

facts

gravity is testable

cavendish

people say it could be static or air, but it was done in so many different ways, with and without vacuum chambers, and they all get nearly the same number down to the decimals

very convenient for static and air to push the lead balls together at the exact same rate every time

Guys

And everyone

We all know

the earth

is

a shape

of a dinosaure

Its just that

I got even proof