- "These NASA documents say the Earth is flat and nonrotating!" The documents did not say that the Earth is flat and nonrotating, they said they assumed the Earth is flat and nonrotating specifically because it is the most efficient way to simplify the mathematics as the curve of the Earth and Earth's rotation does not affect aircrafts in flight.

Guess you were wrong

@Swing and a Miss

Hahahaha

Excellent

- "The stars never change position even though the globe and stars are moving!" The stars are so far away from us that they won't appear to move due to basic perspective. Stars are light years away.

Nasa documents say many thins

Justified

@Swing and a Miss assuming stars are infinitely distant doesn't prove a globe

I never said it was globe earth proof...
And the first document says "flat map", nothing to do with the earth being flat as practically all maps of the earth are going to be flat. The 2nd is that i described, them assuming the earth is flat purely for mathematical simplification.

Why do you defend your captors?

Ever heard of Stockholm syndrome?

Ok... nice argument

@Swing and a Miss you have no globe "proof"

I was never trying to give proof

Mathematical constructs are not proof

Models are not proof

I never said they were

Then get over your bs

Figure out why earth isnt a spinning ball

Then get back to me

damnnnn

You just responded to my arguments with "wrong"

roasted

No real pics

Moon landings fake

Earth doesn't measure as a 25k globe

Sorry about your fantasy

This entire time you didn't respond to any of my arguments besides saying I'm wrong.

No real pictures of the entire flat earth either, so that just at best gets to a draw.
Moon landings being fake doesn't tell us either way.
Measuring will depend on your method, evidence for flat surface does seem too good to ignore but still...

@Swing and a Miss Dude I've tried to get a real debate and when I pin them against the wall and they don't have any more bs to throw at me they just say I'm wrong, passive agressive insult me, and metaphorically run away on the verge of rage tears.

Me: *presents evidence*
Them: ShUtUp yOu GoveRnMenT MindLEss ShEEp

Legit that's all I get every time. Except Jeremy that dude is chill.

Jeremy is really interesting to talk to

It was quite fun interacting with him

@Aquillon https://youtu.be/rDpM9_G3Giw

Just imagine what it's doing to your insides.

Not all waterways are flourinated, and if they are, it's at such minute amounts per/500gal that you'd never, unless allergic, experience any adverse effects FluoriNe, while the most commonly known additive to water, is not the crux of water treatment, more like an post process extra

It's in milk too

And still in minute doses. It's valid to have concerns given Flourine's nature, and seeing reactions to other substances as you displayed above does create the mindset of "what is that doing inside you," and the answer comes down to your digestive fluids don't react in that way to Flourine, and handles it - in the approved and regulated doses - just fine. Milk also isn't, in many regions, government created. There are regulations on safety equipment and minimum standards for making it safe to drink, so flourination is even *less* common, usually reserved for larger dairy corps. So you can avoid the milk worry just fine by locally sourcing your milk from independent dairy farms

But on the subject of water (which is trated in 500 gallon to 1500 gallon tanks in a moderately sized facility), it's not always used. In the United States at least, it really only depends on your region and their local laws

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956646/