Message from @Alexandre
Discord ID: 574419816610529280
Do u not understand that
How do seasons work?
Does the sun change in angular size?
you act all smart but you act like you debunked stars disappearing and reappearing by saying its "perspective"
@der fuhrer's face - relativity? you say? <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ?
why does trump need a wall if there is a ice wall <:smart:484956754489376781>
<:smart:484956754489376781>
Trump is retarded.
Quite literally.
The Sun is very very big
flat earth is "perspective" because you feel like the earth is flat so you must say its true, right?
@der fuhrer's face
Physics you say?
▬and CALCULUS?
.... Ever heard of Louis Essen?... I highly doubt you have because he was conveniently silenced over 40+ years ago ! "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"? A member of the National Physical Laboratory of the UK from which he retired in 1972 after being quietly warned not to continue his contradiction of Einstein's theory of relativity. _"No one has attempted to refute my arguments, but I was warned that if I persisted I was likely to spoil my career prospects... the continued acceptance and teaching of relativity hinders the development of a rational extension of electromagnetic theory."_ - Louis Essen F.R.S. "Relativity and time signals", Wireless World, Oct78, p44
-- What about (freemason) "Sir" Isaac Newton→ (a 33rd Degree Mason), .. Isaac Newton, who's said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with his theory. He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve of his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to "prove" his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called "infinitesimals" which have never been observed. Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with fringe" mathematics. Newton, by the way, was far from a secular scientist, and the bulk of his writings is actually on theology and Christianity.
There is no "local sun"
we should be able to see the sun if the earth is flat
Well u think we live in a magical place where we can see 300 light years away but it doesn’t work like that
even if its night
jeremy we can see ligth years away if its super brigth and big
U can’t see 300 light years away I’m sorry to crush ur dreams
@Alexandre - how many times must you be told/shown?
U can’t
...
if there is light
I’m explaining to u that u can’t
we can see it
@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ because its hard to explain such a force that is so weak and so strong at the same time
🔎
U can see it cause it isn’t 300 light years away
- In "Kings Dethroned", a book written in 1922, Gerard Hickson, the author, who wasn't even a flat earth believer per 'se, refutes Pythagoras, Hipparchus, Kepler, Galileo, Copernicus, Roemer, Kant, Newton, and Einstein. All within a 91 page book... yes it was that easy! Each of these (those) "scientists" went off on a tangent, building on the rationalizations of their predecessors.
Just because a bunch of nuts deceive most to believe a lie/lies .. does not make it the truth.
Are u guys telling me Polaris matches with the inverse square law ?
▬▬EINSTEIN plagiarist
Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist
http://www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-The-Incorrigible-Plagiarist/dp/0971962987
*Dont forget to read all the REVIEWS! --bahaha.
and..
have a Lookey at ..the book -- "the manufacture and sale of saint einstein"
,
And , let's see how this sits with you ..
▬EINSTEIN (wrote) ..
_“You imagine that I look back on my life’s work with calm satisfaction. But from nearby it looks quite different. There is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain whether I am in general on the right track.”_ — Albert Einstein, on his 70th birthday, in a letter to Maurice Solovine, 28 March 1949 (in B. Hoffman Albert Einstein: Creator and Rebel 1972, p.328)
.
***And!..an Interesting READ right here, too!.... http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Albert-Einstein-The-Earth-Mover.pdf
Do u know how big Polaris would have to be to match the inverse square law
.
.
.
_drops the mic_ 🎤
i should see sun when its flat at night
Good job, you can repeat and parrot bs 😂 😂
Hi