it doesn't change facts by wishing it wasn't so

kev, she gave you two papers and you were just like im not interested in reading it.

And yet you still do

Kevin, your article explicitly states there has been no scientific study linking soy to “gender-bending nightmares”.

I also gave you a video to watch

we live on flat earth, wishing you could live in a star wars universe and travel to other solar systems can't make it so

you can do it in your imagination, but its science fiction, not reality

And you are somehow willing to take the word of one guy over the scientific findings of over a dozen different studies.

kev, your article contradicts itself.

you want to live in a star wars universe, create a game around it that will let you, because in reality space is fiction

Stop changing the subject.

It's okay to eat soy, being scared that a bean might make you a woman is irrational

look at it this way

Just don’t drink three quarts of soy milk a day

I can take some ingredient and tell you its harmless

you imbibe said ingredient and end up dead

that's a very terrible analogy kev

someone saying something doesn't change what it actually is

what, its just an ingredient, a poisonous nut

Exactly kev, which is why we linked the studies that disprove the crackpot theory of the gay bean

being scared that a bean might make you a woman is irrational

some ingredients can kill you, its not irrational to realize that the food you eat can affect you in a variety of ways

well you seem to be rather scared about jt

Ok. What about dozens of scientific studies with hundreds of people, all saying it’s fine, or ONE guy who had way too much of it and had some issues? Which one do you trust more?

"avoid soy if your a man and don't wanna become a female"

ugh i have way too much of red meat im getting cancer too

I'm not agreeing with that statement, I'm just repeating it to point out it was said by someone else

That's what you said just before

doesn't mean you're getting cancer by having red meat in proper quantities

We have disproven the affect by showing studies

you have shown that people can be bought to create fake studies, nothing more

Kev, pretty sure you haven't read their studies, and your own study shows internal contradictions

like the cigarette companies did for smoking for many many decades

maybe you should review the history of what the cigarette companies did

those were sponsored studies

pretty sure these are independently written

You didn't even read the full article that you sent yourself

exactly

I don't care if it ends by trying to mitigate its potential libel if soy companies sue them

the facts are the facts,

they don't change by fake studies