Message from @BattlePod
Discord ID: 488578739014336522
It's a theocracy
More or less
Turkey runs their country the right way
Yeee, he is great
Because you aren't undecided on anything.
@[Ex-Mitch] 21.2.19 @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS i thought nat is mainstream
She is.
DUN DUN DUUUU
I'm skeptical of how mainsteamers seem to worship science without seeing it's very real flaws
Just read Kuhn
I'd say I'm questioning
Hm.
I don't know what happened in the 5 mins between the @ everyone and me being blue again
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Please provide 3 proofs or evidences of what you question about the globe.
Aight
How detailed
Moderate detail please.
Does it have to be the globe specificly or mainstream science in general?
Damn nat I'm so sorry
Purple is better than blue
๐
True
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS The questioning role is for conspiracies. The undecided role is specifically for the shape of the earth.
But globe is better than flat
*But what is the shape of the soul?*
Yellow
blob
42
Don't be stupid satan
All acceptable answers here is your PhD in hwatology
๐ผ
42 isnt a word
Yay!
Yay
That isn't a sentance satan. Stop being silly
Shush
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Iโm hoping youโre coming up with your answers. I really do want to see them.
@The Gwench
1. Curvature is hard to observe with the naked eye, and pictures are hotly debated.
2. Composite images of the earth are used rather than real satellite images, I'd like to see them before the touch up.
3. Science right now is very insular and more effort needs to be made to explain complex topics. It's also got the image problem of being an ivory tower. More effort needs to be made to reduce this and create transparency.
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Your 2nd answer is the only acceptable one.
The 1st one is true for both models. The 3rd says nothing of particular import with regards to the shape of the earth. Please provide 2 more. ๐