@xXPuppyLoverXx I think the issue is how YouTube can easily pivot itself to more extermist videos and show them to people watching. The algorithm prefers long videos with lots of comments and that's controversial political content that does that

AI is bullshit too.

You probably could tune it to get rid of daddy o five

But the problem is that you start getting false positives

The more sensitive you make it, the more satire gets caught up in the filter

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS we’re approaching a correlation vs causation problem, it doesn’t favour them directly it just favours a thing that they happen to do

I find it interesting that ISIS propaganda is easily accessible. Like wtf?

Are you looking for it specifically gwench? 😂

>easily Accessible

Yeah

Very

https://bdnews24.com/technology/2018/09/08/youtube-algorithm-sends-germans-seeking-news-to-far-right-tirades

It's reposted from the NYT so it's legit despite the website looking old @xXPuppyLoverXx

Very

Naaa. There’s not a chance in hell I would put myself in that spot.

I don't get it gwench

Uncensored internet means controversial shit will be easily accessible

Me neither, in all my time on the internet ive never seen anything even close to it

^^^^^^

Unless you lose for it

Look

Now if you want it to not be available in the surface web

Then that's a problem

Because you can't have something safeguard your beliefs and still have it uncensored

You can’t censor things from the internet, it just doesn’t work

Streisand effect in a nutshell

@Satan I want the freedom to make my own choices through research and discernment.

You have that freedom now

You have the freedom to do that lok

Lol

Just because there is Isis shit on the internet doesn't mean you're not allowed to make up your own mind

Now if you’re research comes purely from watching YouTube videos, then you’ve got a problem

https://bdnews24.com/technology/2018/09/08/youtube-algorithm-sends-germans-seeking-news-to-far-right-tirades

This is a good article about how the YT alogrithim prefers and shows extermist content, it was on the NYT but reposted to this website

I cannot discern if valuable content is being withheld.

@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS I suppose the controversial factor is a big part of what makes videos get watched a lot in a short amount of time

What’s being withheld?

However I think ethically the alogrithim needs to be changed, dispite it making the most money for YT otherwise you are gonna find a real quick way to disconnect people from reality

Personally, I prefer articles and journals. I can’t stand watching videos.

Yt algorithm sucks

YT alogrithim is bad and I hate it

They want to make it more business friendly and I can't blame them for that

Can we just backtrack a second