Okay Alex Jones for example, he's not allowed on Apple anymore but he isn't being arrested he's still doing his thing and doing his free speech.

He's being deplatformed but he can still say what he likes on his own website.

It would only be a freedom of speech problem if they arrested him

Being deplatformed is censorship

Yeah and being censored is not a freedoms of rights violation

But it is still censorship

@Satan The real question here is, “who really owns the internet”?

Is it okay for a private company to tell you to heck off?

Yes

Is it ethical?

But don't say that you're not censoring them because you are
And I'm not saying that it's wrong to do so

Depends

I'd say not

But that's me

Say I doxx someone should I be banned from discord?

@The Gwench there's no particular entity that does that

I think so

Yeah

Am I being censored?

Yes

So that's appropriate censorship?

Yes

Because I broke the laws of the service it was okay to ban me?

Yes it was okay

But that doesn't mean you weren't being censored

So censorship from online services isn't inherently bad

Never said it was..

I don't agree with it but it's not inherently bad

I just have a problem with people putting themselves on a high horse and preaching how they don't censor when they do exactly that

*cough* alt earth

Can you give me an example?

Oh wait lol

😂

@The Gwench do you agree with Fluff?

But yeah YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, they all censor you and no it isn't bad

Just read from your last message down 😊

It's within their right to decide what they allow in their platform

Oh that similey is a wee bit much

And I agree when you say that we agree to their conditions when we use their site so it's not really upon us to bitch about being censored

I agree with you so far, however I think calling censorship should be a more protected term.

I'm sure there's a word less strong that can be substituted for it in many cases

Because your speech isn't being suppressed just rerouted