Message from @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS
Discord ID: 488668356237328384
Basically having certain rules like we already do is censorship
But it’s not censorship and it’s not violating free speech
I mean you could take that point, however I think you'd be missing my point that I didn't break any of the agreed upon rules. FB can ban anyone that breaks their terms of service by knowingly spreading fake news
👀 it's censorship
Omg guys. I think I’ve changed my mind on this censorship thing. Perhaps I might like it better this way. Thanks for your help in changing my mind.
If you banned anyone who disagrees with the FE model then you might be toeing the line of censorship but it’s still not violating free speech
If I started sending satanic images, then yeah ban me. Or if I was being a dick yeah ban me. But that's a false equivalence if you ban me for "no reason"
*cough* 24/7 *cough*
Having rules is a form of censorship
You not allowing me to be rude is basically still censorship
Not a violation of free speech
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS It is. my right to ban you for whatever reason I see fit. You guys said so.
I elaborated on my point above
Yes, @The Gwench but you have to have a rule against it first
And you can make rules as you see fit
Also rules aren't censorship, if I break my tenancy agreement I'm not being censored. If I break the law I'm not getting censored
@Satan No I don’t. It’s my server...and if I don’t want certain content on my server...I don’t have to.
@Satan the thing is everyone agrees on mainsteam social media rules
Prohibiting someone from doing something is censorship
That's literally what it is
That's not my point nat
I'm being censored from robbing this bank? Or am I missing it more?
I'm not saying yt banning someone because they did something against the rules is wrong
@Satan Huh? No it isn’t. @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS and @xXPuppyLoverXx convinced me of that.
But rules itself are a censorship since you're prohibiting someone from doing something
I mean what happens with no rules? you seem to be against the concept of rules
@Satan I suggest talking to @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS and @xXPuppyLoverXx. They’re the ones working against you.
...
I'm genuinely not getting your point
You don't get my point
I'm not against rules or banning someone because they don't agree with rules I'm just saying that it is a form of censorship so don't say it isn't
Prohibiting someone from doing something is literally what censorship is
The definition is a bit more complex than that
It’s about actively suppressing someone or something, not just removing it from a website
What's the definition then
Removing something from a website *is* actively surpressing them
And again it's within your right to censor
You’re not preventing them from saying it overall though
But you are suppressing them from a platform and rightfully so
They are still allowed to say whatever it is they said, you haven’t suppressed their ability to communicate with other people about it because there is always another site to use
Yeah but they are being censored from that certain platform