Message from @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS
Discord ID: 490021000780709888
lol
Bored
.gif sleepy kitty
https://media.tenor.com/images/e2f61c76196d899de91818d358405cc1/tenor.gif [powered by Tenor]
.gif sleepy night
https://media.tenor.com/images/e11d859df5bf042646eab97d49bca777/tenor.gif [powered by Tenor]
.gif sleepy human
https://media.tenor.com/images/576c8a4d4ab78f6094384a66d856626a/tenor.gif [powered by Tenor]
@Goldsteel sorry to hit you up out of the blue, but have you seen the definitive proof of the flat earth? Even NASA says it's true.
(Am I right for thinking they use less complex models when discussing physics where earth shape has little affect? And theres not proof of a flat earth in nasas publicly available records?)
Scroll up to where Z sends it of you want to have a look
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS It’s not exact proof. But I find it interesting that NASA would even take the time to entertain the idea, given that we supposedly had already been to the moon. It’s rather damning, actually.
True that
I wouldn't call it damming from what I understand of Physics (which is really not enough) you don't need to use full models in all situations. As long as you a count for the main issues for the situation
Damning?
But I'm waiting on a nerd to help
NASA has used transforms to convert spherical coordinates to flat for decades
lol
Here's one now
Oh, thanks
😄
NASA made a stereo graphic projection into a legitimate model, I don’t see how this would prove anything.
It's preferable! In some cases!
It’s preferable in almost any small scale test
The amount of additional math involved due to the smallest smidge of curvature throws off so many things and greatly increases the margin for error
Large scale tests are meant to take curvature into account, but subtleties like curvature for small scale tests is irrelevant, it simply overcomplicates things.
So the margin of effort to account for the curve is more difficult to deal with than not accounting for it?
For minuscule tests, yes
What's minuscule? Houses, flights?
Material tests, terrain vehicles
Please note that the FE model that NASA used accounts for approximately only 30% of the known area of the earth.
The model is notably inaccurate and meant exclusively for testing purposes
Testing in comparison to vehicle tests on a globe? Like the same test run with two different models?
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS It's a projection for the sensor systems onboard
The map is displayed radially for convenience
It has issues, though
40% maximal error bar on a measurement is not using SQUID I can tell you that
The magnetometer is old
1985
Now the king of the nerds has rightfully taken over his place in the argument
All hail nerd king Goldsteel