Very high energy neutrinos (ones above the GZK cutoff) actually have a fairly noticeable cross section

eeek evil!

@dumblebore 🌈 yes on the ATLAS experiment

damnnnn

satanic

that's cool af

I'm going to go grab some food, pay some bills

bye

ok

don't go doing any flat earth resesarch without me

we've done it

here's the result: not flat

why research something that's been shown to be inconsistent multiple times

that's called being insane

doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change

Like being a globie

Good example

not tho

lol

gottem

oof

Difference is that it's coming out exactly as I expect

You know we are not a spinning space ball

Yet continue to propagandize it

I don't tho

I think what most flat earthers do sounds more like propoganda than what I do

<:smart:484956754489376781>

What do you think of this problem i found.

Rotating Atmosphere Paradox:
From Galileo Was Wrong: If we are on a rotating Earth with air subject only to gravity (i.e., the atmosphere is not coupled or bound by any forces to turn with the Earth), then we would experience tremendous wind problems, in which the spinning Earth encounters the full weight of the atmosphere. (NB: The atmosphere weighs more than 4 million billion tons.)

If we are on an Earth that is rotating, the atmosphere would obviously have to move with it. So, there needs to be some mechanism that allows this. However, there is so far no explained mechanism for this effect that is required on a rotating earth. There is no explanation for how friction would enable an atmosphere rotating in sync with Earth throughout the atmospheric altitudes.
The strength of friction decreases as the altitude increases, with it being inversely proportional to altitude. Friction may work right at the surface, with the strongest gravitational pull, but it decreases as the altitude increases, and so doesn't keep the entire atmosphere in sync with Earth's rotation.
Friction's effects on air motion decrease as the altitude increases -- to a point (usually 1-2 km) where it has no effect at all.
-- http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/fw/bndy.rxml

Air is not very viscous ("sticky"), so "real" friction (the one that comes from molecular motion) is only important in a very thin layer of atmosphere next to the surface. However, air is very turbulent. This turbulence generates small-scale up and down motion, which mixes slow air from the friction layer with fast air from above, thereby spreading the effect of molecular friction over a layer a few hundred meters thick (turbulence is the reason for wind gusts). This interaction with the surface slows down atmospheric motion.
-- http://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/ees/climate/lectures/atm_dyn.html

It is important to note that an atmosphere added to a rotating Earth would slow down the rotation and therefore decrease angular momentum overtime. This would be because of the frictional force that is from the interaction of the Earth's surface and atmosphere.
But, it hasn't been explained how friction would work even for the lower parts of Earth's atmosphere, to keep it rotating with Earth. In order for the atmosphere to rotate along with Earth, there would need to be some lateral force proportional to altitude that supports the upper atmosphere. But of course, that couldn't be since it would make it harder to travel against the Earth's rotation, since the force would be towards rotation.
This problem doesn't exist for a stationary geocentric Earth, and if Earth were rotating, this dilemma would exist for it. This represents a paradox for the contemporary model of our Earth.
A great deal of research has been carried out concerning the influence of the Earth's movement. The results were always negative (...) We do not have any means of discovering whether or not we are carried along in a uniform motion of translation...

also you have no business telling me what I believe

- Henri Poincaré , From Poincaré’s lecture titled: “L’état actuel et l’avenir de la physique mathematique,” St.Louis, Sept 24, 1904, Scientific Monthly, April, 1956.
The failure of the many attempts to measure terrestrially any effects of the earth's motion on physical phenomena allows us to...[Pauli gives up looking for experimental evidence and moves on to the abstract 'escape hatch' theories of Einstein]
- Wolfgang Pauli, The Theory of Relativity, 1958, p. 4.
No physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion.
- Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, 2nd rev. edition, 1957, p. 73.

.

well what a dump

Yes the atmosphere weighs 4 million billion tons but it's spread over the entire earth

If you had a thinking cap i wouldnt be so critical

seems you lack one tho

What I said demonstrates this

You said a bunch of garbage tho

You weighed the atmosphere. Brilliant

well the people here will judge tgat

What scale did you use

you weighed it though, citizen...