Message from @Yoda
Discord ID: 494078581685616640
Yes, but special relativity is a part of general relativity. Lorentz aether predicts completely wrong results in curved spacetime.
sigma 5 is an ostrich
yes
who else here is an ostrich and doesn't want to look at the facts of flat earth
im saying that relativity is derived from ether
No, it isn't
literaly is tho
Literally isn't though
its fake math
he was inspired by lorentz idea
Yes, in no way does that mean relativity is derived from it.
here is a rendering of a particle i made
i coded it with (SPECIAL relativity)
turns out it still solves the wave equation
wich is essentially ether
code
That is not essentially aether, no. Things being a wave does not in any way imply aether
it solves linear wave equation
3d wave equation
Yes, many things nothing to do with the aether solve a wave equation
the ether implies wave equation
wave equation is basicly the ether
No, basic maths implies the wave equation
No it's not at all
so what does the ether imply?
That's obviously completely untrue. Is a wave in a pool due to the aether?
The fact that waves can exist in an aether, does not mean waves cannot exist without an aether
you do know the ether is the idea that there is a medium that transmitts the waves right?
Yes
That transmits waves of light
Not any wave
Einstien did away with the Ether
^ Kevin is right there, a stopped clock is right twice a day
someone was saying that was where he made a mistake, you need a medium for light to move thru
just because that is an assertion I saw doesn't make it right or wrong