also there is the problem of ring species

yes i agree its probably a nonsensical idea also

its like trying to partition land area

there are times where i use systems that break intuition

i may actually say that lions and tigers are the same species

but that really bothers my intuition

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

That would be incorrect

acording to what deffinition

by my deffinition its not incorrect

its a semantical thing

it usualy gets down to what both sides mean

il only use that system when is only convienient

What most people use now is DNA

so its dna difrence?

Which is how we find new species that look exactly like each other

it debends on the deffinition of species

acording to a difrent deffinition they may be definitionaly the same

what is the dna deffinition of species?\

That's the preferred way now, but I feel we might be getting symantic again. If I wanted that I'd argue the shape of the earth

Well we look for different genetic markers

it only gets semantical when you say no its wrong even tho i say it is in fact a semantical difrence

Which might happen soon

https://youtu.be/4QclvXCbRJc

oh man

"thru this entire debate we haven't heard a single argument that atheism is true"

atheism is not a thing to be true

its not a claim

they even said that multiple times in the debate that its not a claim

at the end of the debate they still end up saying that shit?

"hes not the moral nihilist the way he says he is"
he never said he is (altho i wasent entirely listening so i may be wrong)

don't yall think tony blair was pretty dapper?

I mean he committed war crimes so no

lol

but otherwise he did have pretty good looks

nothing beats obama though. obama was daddy af

Haha

Ok

<:tomato:486195703706681345>

I got some schiit in the mail