Why would they change the system that protects them and keeps them in power and rich ^

Correct, we would need to sweep the laws clean off all the extra stuff added since the last amendment of the constitution. Even then we would need to abolish like 2-4 of them because they are slavery related and I'm sure we can all agree we could move on from that as a whole

pressure from everyone else for the removal of extreme inequity

@TacticalBeard because they have to be overthrown to make them Subject to the constitution

^

We live in a modern day version of history of 🇬🇧

Heaven forbid I use an anime reference here, but our politicians act like the uncrowned kings of the US

redistribute the wealth, allocate a percentage to develop critical reparations and technology

Sounds like communism ^

You can't redistribute because that defeats the purpose of capitalism

should a cap be put on net worth? I dont believe the idea originally was of an america run by a few billionaires

And we have to be mindful of trying to make too many unions or we end up like the EU and right back where we started

I'm not an expert on anything really, let alone the intricacies of modern politics and how to change things

Renaissance? Yes. Anarchist revival.

i like the fantastical idea of robin hood economics but recognize that is it unrealistic

its cuz im poor

and envious

Incentives. Because if we tax the hell out of the rich they will take their business elsewhere, if we tax the product import they will stop importing because of cost vs people actually buying product at extreme cost

simple redistribution of wealth from the top 1% who lobbied government for more taxation and regulation to siphon it from the rest. Then decentralization. If you want communism, go for it with like minded individuals. Don't force it on the rest. Whatever you want, seek it. I'm more a fan of night watch anarcho-capitalism.

It's a very rough circle of cost and the only reason I'm aware is I drive a semi for a living so I watch the cost of a product first hand go up or down in final shelf cost due to the cost of production

No system can be perfect.

if my math is right

We would have to remove ourselves from the equation for perfection. We're the most flawed element of them all

bezos could personally give every american 250,000 and still have almost 2 billion

There's a very very easy answer but it's a very dark solution many overlook

Anarchy? 😊😊😊

> bezos could personally give every american 250,000 and still have almost 2 billion
@AbysmalWizard
I don't think those numbers are right, that would cost about 75 trillion dollars

If you have seen End Game, or (even though I don't agree with him) Bill Gates, along with if you decide to go off the extreme deep end to the Georgia Guide Stones to the NWO. There does need to be a decrease in the population of the world

@Tessik more

you're right, i'm way off

but he could give every american 25$ and still have a couple billion left to spare

thats probably what it was lmao i was off by a factor of many tens

i was trying to do all the conversions in my head and royally missed target

Wrong. We have plenty of resources. Statism cannot sustain the human race. And the earth will not last forever. It is something to leave.

The way to redistribute wealth is to take away the endless supply of human bodies they could go through as companies

I agree we need SMI2LE

Space Migration

Intelligence Increase

Life Extension

We have to work towards colonizing other worlds

Space mining when