PEOPLE FORGET HOW MUCH REALLY BAD STUFF THEY AVOIDED

HOW LIMITED THEIR POWER HAS BEEN FOR THE PAST THOUSAND YEARS

AND

THE GREATER TRAGEDIES BROUGHT ON BY DEMOCRACY

The redistribution of income through make-work programs at a minimum.

The difference from socialism being that ends were not acquired by happenstance according to illusory circumstance but instead through means, means of work.

Makenworombevr worksm

Make work never works.

Look at China now.

So many of the soe

Can't compete

With Vietnam or kora.

Korea

Or the usa

The zaitbatsu and chaebols beat them

As they want money

Not totalitarian guanxi

It might have been at a minimum but that was just because the Nazis were more sane than the Weimar Republic and the liberalism that was ubiquitous throughout most of the rest of the world. They also glorified the single mother, made "corn syrup" like incentives and write offs for their farmers, went on a massive anti-smoking campaign and while I understand why, scapegoated the Jews. Socialism is socialism, no matter how lite it is. The Nazis had their points, are much more sympathetic than what shitlibs want you to think and even weren't as savage as they want you to think. However, the overall system was a mistake. Hitler didn't even want to be the Fuhrer, as a matter of fact. They should have restored their Kaizer.

Nazis were socialism

It's in the name

yup

Sozialismus.

They to toughen it up like a lesbian with dad jeans and a buzzcut

But still weren't even the most functional totalitarian state

In Europe

Economically

The Nazis picked Socialism as part of their name at the behest of Rudolf Jung, who knew it to be of propagandist use in attracting voters among other things.

Taking control of the economic life was not intended to enrich the people, it was intended to subjugate them to the state after which point they could be re-modeled into a blooded-ideal.

The Soviets had the advantage of noelt being broke
As fuck build apartments out of real concrete and not with straw?

National Socialism is only 'Socialism' in the Austrian sense.

It's a the same thing

It's the same shit man

Racial paradise socialist workers paradise.

Same crap

Different names.

Different imagined favored people

The idea was never to empower the workers.

The goal was to take their livelihoods - their work and the only form of life in Liberalism - and use that as a means to reform them into whatever was pleased.

No the point of communism is not to empower the people.

If Liberalism has made the economic all that matters in life then subjugating the economic allows you to put life under your control.

National Socialism/Fascism, I'm saying.

Read why Lenin thought he was democratic