Yeah, puts it in perspective doesn't it

@Mosley I do that all the time. I thought I was unique. Cunt damn it.

I don't understand? What is wrong here? This is tame compared to how gays get?

It's just ordinary faggotry

No, it isn't.

how not

I don't know, I'm red pilled on women and never fucking went beyond that

Have you guys considered

that Jack Donovan's whole outlook

I don't honestly understand homosexuals, that Forney dude seems to have been right about one thing about them

great as some of his stuff is

may be an aspect of sexual fetishism?

his whole image

To them, orgasm is the principle around which everything seems to evolve

that's a good insight

they are fixated on sex

Men fuck. Gay men fuck men. Where is the youthe obsession? The relationship drama? The self absorption? The disregard for dignity? The coprophilia? The out and out hebephilia? Even pedophilia? This is not typical faggotry at all.

you can see it in Jack Donovan's words too, in that post

Simply being an active homosexual means self absorption, disregard for dignity and coprophilia

pretty much all faggots who dont have some super specific fetish

are chickenhawks

they eat da poo poo

My argument being that Donovan is not a faggot.

that dude knew what he was talking about

is this about establishing some distinction between homosexual and faggot

like black and nigger

The guy's a faggot, it doesnt make his good words less true

Is coprophilia a real thing?

Very much so

Or rather a revival of the 14th Century notion that there are no gay men, only gay acts. What calls itself a gay man is an advocate and advocates for one thing, push another by implication.

That notion is quite correct

Men are going to be moved by the aesthetics of masculinity, like any other beauty.

but not very relevant to JD

Bathhouse??

homosexuals specifically fetishize these aspects

What the hell is this?

and divorce them from the context

that gives them meaning

haram

Jack Donovan has aspects of this

it doesn't come out in what he says