Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 287335046401097728
for insanity
can relate, from being paranoid
this is why I was never down with "cull <120"
because it's the less intelligent people who are more in touch with "common sense"
for whom tradition is not simply an abstraction
but something that perfuses their life
something they value as more than an idea
the smarter people can more fully realize that truth, but they are less equipped from the starting point
i would say that there are things better suited for <120 iqs
their instinct is to go against tradition
NOT making decisions that affect the well-being of an entire population
I don't entirely disagree, but
all about merit to me
no, this is a bit dangerous I think, the way you are going down
we already live in a cognitive meritocracy
most of history was religious, military and aristocratic elites
only now, in modernity, do we have an "ideas men" elite
since the enlightenment or renaissance one could say, gradually leading to the current state
your average shitlib journo
is smarter than most people
normies can just persist
if they dont receive the wrong signals from top down
they will keep things going
the answers of tradition (small t) and common sense may not be immediately rational, nor efficient
but the weight of history is behind them, they work
and they will keep working, even with problems
Smart people are much more at risk of going completely off the rails.
I think normies would turn on a dime, if you change the top down signals
oftentimes they do
like in the past
when a people were conquered
which is to be expected living in such an irrational world
they took on the faith of the conquered mostly willingly
Also, people of my group/ethnicity/race who are average in IQ are still "ours."
it's the marginally above average people who are the most insufferable
meritocracy has proved to have little merit for the goal of preserving civilization.
@profagonist VERY true
we're not in a meritocracy though
we're in the throes of credentialism