Message from @sampletext

Discord ID: 287334492371157002


2017-03-03 21:21:54 UTC  

would you like me to clarify a statement @sampletext ? Just ask

2017-03-03 21:21:59 UTC  

a tool i always use is influence

2017-03-03 21:22:08 UTC  

There has to be good faith, and love

2017-03-03 21:22:12 UTC  

i just found "[4:20 PM] fallot: the most ripe targets for conversion are the liberals who respect you and who you respect" intriguing.

2017-03-03 21:22:15 UTC  

it cannot be simply a pragmatic approach

2017-03-03 21:22:22 UTC  

yee yee 420 #blazeit

2017-03-03 21:22:36 UTC  

because if someone has no respect for you, it's easy for them to retreat behind their defenses

2017-03-03 21:22:41 UTC  

your mind, especially if you are smart

2017-03-03 21:22:44 UTC  

is very capable of leading you astray

2017-03-03 21:22:56 UTC  

the smarter people form very complete and multifaceted justifications

2017-03-03 21:22:57 UTC  

for insanity

2017-03-03 21:22:58 UTC  

can relate, from being paranoid

2017-03-03 21:23:20 UTC  

this is why I was never down with "cull <120"

2017-03-03 21:23:34 UTC  

because it's the less intelligent people who are more in touch with "common sense"

2017-03-03 21:23:39 UTC  

for whom tradition is not simply an abstraction

2017-03-03 21:23:44 UTC  

but something that perfuses their life

2017-03-03 21:23:55 UTC  

something they value as more than an idea

2017-03-03 21:24:22 UTC  

the smarter people can more fully realize that truth, but they are less equipped from the starting point

2017-03-03 21:24:27 UTC  

i would say that there are things better suited for <120 iqs

2017-03-03 21:24:30 UTC  

their instinct is to go against tradition

2017-03-03 21:24:41 UTC  

NOT making decisions that affect the well-being of an entire population

2017-03-03 21:24:54 UTC  

I don't entirely disagree, but

2017-03-03 21:24:54 UTC  

all about merit to me

2017-03-03 21:25:04 UTC  

no, this is a bit dangerous I think, the way you are going down

2017-03-03 21:25:10 UTC  

we already live in a cognitive meritocracy

2017-03-03 21:25:33 UTC  

most of history was religious, military and aristocratic elites

2017-03-03 21:25:48 UTC  

only now, in modernity, do we have an "ideas men" elite

2017-03-03 21:26:01 UTC  

since the enlightenment or renaissance one could say, gradually leading to the current state

2017-03-03 21:26:17 UTC  

your average shitlib journo

2017-03-03 21:26:21 UTC  

is smarter than most people

2017-03-03 21:26:53 UTC  

smart people have the most danger from becoming ideologically unmoored

2017-03-03 21:26:56 UTC  

normies can just persist

2017-03-03 21:27:05 UTC  

if they dont receive the wrong signals from top down

2017-03-03 21:27:08 UTC  

they will keep things going

2017-03-03 21:27:27 UTC  

the answers of tradition (small t) and common sense may not be immediately rational, nor efficient

2017-03-03 21:27:37 UTC  

but the weight of history is behind them, they work

2017-03-03 21:27:43 UTC  

and they will keep working, even with problems

2017-03-03 21:27:48 UTC  

@fallot I very much agree with you.

2017-03-03 21:28:07 UTC  

Smart people are much more at risk of going completely off the rails.

2017-03-03 21:28:43 UTC  

I think normies would turn on a dime, if you change the top down signals

2017-03-03 21:28:45 UTC  

oftentimes they do