Message from @Jim
Discord ID: 289130383780610049
it really is just that simple
am I in favour of such a reductive approach? No, but it works
so its the starting point for discussion
I agree with that
Most people could be together and be sufficiently happy if it was asked of them, particularly if they weren't constantly lied to about what the grass looks like on the other side
that's right
looking at it that way, it's amazing how insidiously its roots are attacked
the variety of the signals and the ubiquity of them
My immediate examples of staying together for the kids aren't in agreement
"we all deserve better" is the modern mantra
"follow your heart"
a great truth, twisted towards evil ends
to those whose hearts are dead, they can follow only whim
and whim can be entered into their consciousness, top down
who has a dead heart
what does that even mean
it means spiritually dead
huh
as for who, the majority of western people and probably people full stop
"everyone is worth it" "championing diversity"
Following your heart effectively translates to: "following the loose tangle of urges that make up your being".
all these people look evil except cheryl cole's baby bump
@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ That's a consequence of the high penalty of divorce. Actually I think reintroducing fault to divorce would be helpful.
which looks like a baby
that would be whim @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻
and yes, it effectively translates to that in those whose hearts are dead
mindfulness is a whim just as much as wanting to plow butt
when you dont know what you could want
What
then what you "really want" is just "what you feel like at the time"
really, it would always just create doubt
and dissatisfaction with the way things are
Keeping families together is most important
Not just practically even, it's good for us
kept together families = happy people
Parents should divorce after their children reach adulthood if they have to
Unless there is violence or abuse
the emotions are related to will reflecting its condition
I mean they get tangled up in other shit too