Message from @HyperBaroque

Discord ID: 544259820421775390


2019-02-10 20:48:55 UTC  

@nerd I'm willing to meet at a middle ground of the Earth being an oblate tetrahedron.

2019-02-10 20:49:38 UTC  

Two vertices at the poles, three at equidistant points around the equator, and the sides bulging out.

2019-02-10 20:49:44 UTC  

Okay, well I'm rping right now. Like corgi said, he runs a political nation states server

2019-02-10 20:49:56 UTC  

Err, one at one of the poles

2019-02-10 20:50:02 UTC  

Three arpund the globe

2019-02-10 20:50:08 UTC  

I dunno

2019-02-10 20:50:08 UTC  

The problem is no curvature

2019-02-10 20:50:22 UTC  

Well if the sides bulge a *lot* ...

2019-02-10 20:50:30 UTC  

That's theory

2019-02-10 20:50:41 UTC  

To accommodate an assumed model

2019-02-10 20:51:14 UTC  

Tetrahedron is the smallest number of vertices and faces to enclose a sphere in a geodesic form so I'm willing to go that far.

2019-02-10 20:51:37 UTC  

So you dont believe in gravity?

2019-02-10 20:52:00 UTC  

Why believe in a theory?

2019-02-10 20:52:01 UTC  

How could gravity work in that case.

2019-02-10 20:52:16 UTC  

How would believing in a theory help anybody do anything...

2019-02-10 20:52:43 UTC  

I don't. I'm just saying, if you are going to be honest, then why not look at the flat earth evidence

2019-02-10 20:52:50 UTC  
2019-02-10 20:53:05 UTC  

😁

2019-02-10 20:53:37 UTC  

Still think it should be the theme song of the server

2019-02-10 20:53:37 UTC  

I mean if I was solving some engineering problem I would use a vector pointed toward the nearest presumed center of gravity with a scalar of 9.8m/s^2 , doesn't mean I "believe in" something, it's just practical application of observable phenomena.

2019-02-10 20:54:13 UTC  

So it will be kinda hard to trip me up on that point.

2019-02-10 20:54:41 UTC  

*center of Earth gravity, or 1G

2019-02-10 20:55:26 UTC  

If I had some rrason to believe I was working with variable G forces and multiple bodies I would hope a computer was doing the math?

2019-02-10 20:55:28 UTC  

have you seen there is places on earth suface where gravity is missing?

2019-02-10 20:55:40 UTC  

scientists are baffled by it for decades

2019-02-10 20:55:56 UTC  

Where gravity is... Missing?

2019-02-10 20:55:59 UTC  

they came up with theory on top of theory to explain it

2019-02-10 20:56:01 UTC  

I'm passingly familiar with gravitational anomalies.

2019-02-10 20:56:13 UTC  

Like, entirely missing?

2019-02-10 20:56:18 UTC  

No.

2019-02-10 20:56:21 UTC  

I am willing to allow there might be a singularity at the core of the Earth.

2019-02-10 20:56:41 UTC  

just missing in the sense that it does not match the standard models predictions

2019-02-10 20:56:46 UTC  

And of course completely willing to cede to hollow earth theories due to that.

2019-02-10 20:57:09 UTC  

Ah

2019-02-10 20:57:18 UTC  

I would want to know where magma comes from in that case though.

2019-02-10 20:58:05 UTC  

they make up things like mantle convection and 10000 year old ice sheets causing the anomaly.

2019-02-10 20:58:27 UTC  

I think gravitational and magnetic anomalies might be interrelated somehow. We're lacking a unifying theory of physics for that atm sadly.

2019-02-10 20:58:52 UTC  

10000 year old ice sheets that lasted for 10000 years and dispeared 10000 years ago. quite the stretch

2019-02-10 21:00:21 UTC  

gtg for a bit. have some chores to do, bbl

2019-02-10 21:01:08 UTC  

@HyperBaroque good chat thx

2019-02-10 21:01:42 UTC  

I think if we really put in the work, we could find a best fit for a tetrahedral model of earth, 4 equidistant points between which some observable surface features suggest bulging faces, and at which points some subsurface features suggest some correlating fracturing or something.