Message from @Kalvin
Discord ID: 298197855653462017
you can see a definite causation
omg a case report! 😮
shut. Down. EVERYTHING
I gave you an example of an area in which large scale statistical analysis of this sort is flawed
and explained to you that such effect need many, many years to establish
I guess it's all worth looking into
but you don't know anything about it, so you accept this "SCIENCE!" like a reddit drone
instead of the way you should take it
soy milk has been around for a very long time
I'm aware
widely used in china since the 1800s
taken by asians and western fags
Looking into a variety of viewpoints
lol 1800s isn't a long time
Soy milk was introduced to the US market by Vitasoy in 1979; the first domestic manufacturer of soy milk was Sunrich Food Group, which introduced its products in 1985.[3]
but I don't care
did all asians develop gyno?
should they?
is there an evil ghost in soy that gives you gyno, or is this one of those things we'd have seen by now?
the argument isn't that they will get gyno, but the effect of feminzing chemicals
what does it do to you?
we don't know
do these hormones have a psychological effect?
Lactose intolerant asiatics
almost certainly
obviously it didn't keep them from breeding
it's pretty obvious that the entire asian population was not consuming soy milk as an alternative to cow's milk
but it doesn't even matter
yeah science doesn't matter
I agree
jewish lies
drink the full fat
195.5
Indo-euros tend to be able to handle different foods
I'm telling you science, it contains feminizing chemicals (100%)
your meta analysis shows that to date, we have not found it to have obvious feminizing effects in any study
that doesn't mean the topic is well studied
it doesn't mean there is enough data to establish this
on the other hand, we have a case report where causation is quite obviously established