Message from @Death Strike's Bat
Discord ID: 298874561733197824
I responded that this was the case for most of the history of Christianity in the west
essentially
no
present a disagreement then
the bible is not the word of god
irrelevant
the christian god transcends human experience
despite being human
irrelevant again
why don't you just clearly say
"No, if someone cast aspertions on the bible throughout most of Christian history, they wouldn't suffer harm"
is it not true perhaps?
Muslims can still be inbred idiots, with that being true/false
Christianity doesn't ordain killing heretics as a religious tenet.
furthermore Orthodoxy and Heresey have different implications
than in Islam
You're not addressing the issue
Why is that
for what they do cosmologically
It doesn't matter what either religion says about heresy
No, it doesn't, because you could get lynched by angry people over much more minor shit than that
but frankly the christian mobs are usually more interesting in forcibly baptizing heathens
and killing jews and muslims
I just don't understand why you cannot acknowledge the simple logic
it's not like it affects your position
or forcibly baptizing them and then killing them
so at least their souls would be saved
be that as it may, how would they respond to someone casting aspertions on the bible in public
would they let it go
would they respond with mild censure
or would they be madder
it's really simple I think?
What is there to textually criticize about hte historiocity of the gospels?
okay, you're just not going to answer are you
suit yourself
Other than matthew, mark, luke, and john didn't write them?
and they didn't know jesus?
"It's all bullshit"
the critique doesn't have to be true or false.