Good afternoon, gentlemen

hi @MRB

@Death Strike's Bat you made a reference about inbred jawas having an unkind reaction to someone questioning their religious text, in this case the Quran

yes

I responded that this was the case for most of the history of Christianity in the west

essentially

no

present a disagreement then

the bible is not the word of god

irrelevant

the christian god transcends human experience

despite being human

irrelevant again

why don't you just clearly say

"No, if someone cast aspertions on the bible throughout most of Christian history, they wouldn't suffer harm"

is it not true perhaps?

Muslims can still be inbred idiots, with that being true/false

Christianity doesn't ordain killing heretics as a religious tenet.

furthermore Orthodoxy and Heresey have different implications

than in Islam

You're not addressing the issue

Why is that

for what they do cosmologically

It doesn't matter what either religion says about heresy

yes it does

No, it doesn't, because you could get lynched by angry people over much more minor shit than that

but frankly the christian mobs are usually more interesting in forcibly baptizing heathens

and killing jews and muslims

I just don't understand why you cannot acknowledge the simple logic

it's not like it affects your position

or forcibly baptizing them and then killing them

so at least their souls would be saved

be that as it may, how would they respond to someone casting aspertions on the bible in public

would they let it go

would they respond with mild censure

or would they be madder

it's really simple I think?

What is there to textually criticize about hte historiocity of the gospels?

okay, you're just not going to answer are you

suit yourself

Other than matthew, mark, luke, and john didn't write them?