No, it doesn't, because you could get lynched by angry people over much more minor shit than that

but frankly the christian mobs are usually more interesting in forcibly baptizing heathens

and killing jews and muslims

I just don't understand why you cannot acknowledge the simple logic

it's not like it affects your position

or forcibly baptizing them and then killing them

so at least their souls would be saved

be that as it may, how would they respond to someone casting aspertions on the bible in public

would they let it go

would they respond with mild censure

or would they be madder

it's really simple I think?

What is there to textually criticize about hte historiocity of the gospels?

okay, you're just not going to answer are you

suit yourself

Other than matthew, mark, luke, and john didn't write them?

and they didn't know jesus?

"It's all bullshit"

the critique doesn't have to be true or false.

http://www.sfgate.com/business/technology/article/Cyborgs-at-work-employees-getting-implanted-with-11046009.php

Will such a thing ever catch on? I think it's a pretty big jump from even wearing such stuff

to actually implanting it in your body

I think it won't take

not as things currently stand at least

would any of you accede to such a device if let's say you were sure there was nothing shifty going on?

A few months ago I saw a common core question (language arts) asking students to write a paragraph supporting a new microchip implant. I think it may be more palatable in the future as it's already being normalized now.

Looking for the article now.

Really? Fascinating

I believe it was a part of the US Common Core curriculum. I could be mistaken though.

I can't find anything googling offhand, where did you encounter it?

I'll take your word for it but I'm curious

Ill find it - I'm equally curious where I saw it and the context.

http://i.imgur.com/rZJDGZI.jpg

Meme magic

@devolved I'm reading AnonCon

I'll paste a section as an example of where his worldview just falls apart, totally inconsistent

One worrying aspect is leftist r-strategists tend to have high creativity, perhaps as an outgrowth of an evolved drive to create and exploit alternative resource streams as a way of avoiding direct conflict. As a result leftists tend to operate in these fields, and exhibit some measure of competence.

So r-"strategists" tend to have higher creativity? Woudn't you expect higher creativity from K-selected populations that have to make do with limited resources or poor conditions?

this kind of incoherence pops up every time I see r/K stuff applied directly to liberal vs. conservative

Indeed

But would you say it works, loosely